discontent and excitement. Our party understands with sympathy that, rather, as a part of this concern the Central committee of CPI( M-L) took this onerous task, on its shoulder“ we took the initiative to organize this seminar with humbleness and concern towards the Indian Communist Movement and as an attempt to locate the challenges and problems faced by it. Though we have varied and differing opinions”. In our opinion the task should have been different. What are the reasons for the continuing splits among revolutionaries and the revolutionary organisations for the last 50 years? Communist revolutionaries must think deeply to find out the reasons behind these splits and find out the ways to resolve them. To become a single party it is duty of all Communist Revolutionaries to wake up all the necessary methods and steps. As our Basic documents 1981 cited, when the internal struggle took place inside the CPI( M), none of the nationwide reputed leaders come out from CPI( M). Along with that at the same time the Naxalbari leaders resorted to groupism and negative propaganda against the revolutionaries who were coming out CPI( M) the naxalbari leadership looked down at the Andhra leadership; Who had a strong movement. They merged with AICCR in October 68 and were expelled in February 69 without reasonable causes. In April 69 itself the Andhra leadership started armed struggle in Godavari valley.
In a short span of time, most of the Andhra leadership was arrested in December 1969. As the leaderships did not show enough maturity to resolve the post-arrest political and organizational problems, the APRCP split in to two in June-July 1971. Groupism and left adventurism continued by the CPI( M-L) leaders like Charu Majumdar eyc., led the party towards its split. These two splits led to many splits and unities; Unity of new organizations, and their formation, emergence of wrong political and ideological theories, emergence of small organizations with more wrong politics were started. Some developments took place in the mean time, some of them brought forward new arguments like development and change in the country and did good bye to revolution; some of them could neither able to continue with the revolutionary organisations nor join the revisionists and started forming and new revolutionary organizations.
The APRCP formed under the leadership of comrade C. P. in 1971 and the re-organised CPI( M-L) under the leadership of comrade Satyanarain Singh formed after internal struggle with Charu Majumdar merged into CPI( M-L) in 1975. This development ignited spirit and encouragement among the revolutionaries. This organization, without consent from the cadres lifted Election boycott and decided to participate the elections in 1977. With this many wrong trends came forward in the next elections held soon after lifting of Emergency. During the talks with the
16
Janata Government many wrong trends appeared. Nevertheless, comrade C. P. did his level best to continue revolutionary politics and path. In the name of looming danger of third World War SNS-Nandi- Rana brought a split in 1979 just before the congress. And did not attend to the 1980 Congress. Soon SNS Organisation faces another split.
1980 special congress and 1981 Plenum held under the leadership of comrade Chadra Pullareddi played a glorious role to protect and safeguard the revolutionary programme and path. But during the 13 years of state political and organizational review, one section of the State Committee could not show self critic attitude and organizational maturity. The revolutionaries brought together by the two APRCP sections suffered split in 1971 started unity discussions exactly when the CPI( M-L) led by comrade Chandra Pullareddi suffered split in 1984. The CPI( M-L) led by SNS merged with the majority CPI( M- L) in 1985. Our Party differences with UCCRI( M-L) led by comrade Anand were discussed and broadly resolved but the unity could not be achieved. Party led by comrade D. V. also suffered a split in 1984. The People’ s war, a revolutionary organization, organized by comrade K. S. also suffered a split. The main reason for these splits were organizational immaturity of the leaders.
The splits within the organizations led by comrade C. P., comrades D. V., T. N. once again brought severe losses to the advancement of revolutionary movement. These splits led to form many organizations in the later course of time. Failure of unity talks among CPI( M-L) TND, CPI( M-L) Resistance and UCCRI( M- L) 1990-1991; later on formation of“ Janashakti” of seven parties unity, its disintegration has led to severe depression and disappointment among entire revolutionaries. We must review all these developments and draw proper lessons in detail. At the same time while safeguarding the ongoing Godavari vally resistance struggle and movement lead by the Maoist party in Central India, the revolutionary organizations should resolve their political, ideological and organizational issues with patient discussions, by getting ready for self critical reviews, joint actions to achieve unity. Our party opines that the revolutionary organizations should concentrate their all powers only on this. But not of joint action and unity with CPI and CPI( M).
The Central Committee of CPI( M-L) in its“ Key Note Document” cited five points and explained in detail.“ in this light, we must check out the challenges being faced by the struggling forces been waging struggles for change in Indian society...”. We will explain our attitude towards this in brief. We would like to bring to the notice of you and other delegates about the nature of Indian society, main enemy-friends, main contradiction, power transfer in 1947:
Class Struggle