The ruling classes have allotted the Home and agricultural Ministries to the central leaders of CPI . The ruling classes also have come forward to provide Prime Minister post to Mr . Jyothibasu as the P . B . Leader of CPI ( M ): The ruling classes elected Somanadh Chattargjee the CPI ( M ) senior leader as speaker of Loksabha . These two parties have been facingly criticizing the politics and ideology of revolutionaries . They have been supporting repression and suppression on revolutionaries and globalization policies of the ruling class governments . Its approach in Nandigram of West Bengal is well known worldwide . Everyone knows the way how these two parties backed the UPA government and its policies . Everyone knows the hollowness of their proposed amendments towards SEZs . CPI ( M )’ s defeat in Bengal elections is an axe wound towards its parliamentary path . Its defeat in Tripura and BJP fascist ’ s attacks against CPI ( M ) clearly exposing the hollowness of its parliamentary politics . In this background , to protect their existence , they are trying to pretend somewhat differently towards the revolutionaries from the past . They are giving call for the unity of all the communists ; but these two parties- CPI and CPI ( M ) having no basic differences between them are unable to explain why do these two parties did not achieve unity .
Until the Soviet Union and the Eastern European countries collapsed these two revisionist parties had been maintaining the development of socialist structure in the Soviet Union . While colluding with the Soviet social imperialism opposing the American imperialism alone they claimed as if they are opposing the entire imperialism . The CPI took out anti-Stalin attitude . The CPI ( M ) took out an attitude to follow the four great teachers . At the same time these two parties could not consider the ongoing socialist structure under comrade Mao leadership in China . Both CPI and CPI ( M ) thoroughly criticized the Great proletariat Cultural revolution led by comrade Mao with minor differences . The CPI severely and most vehemently criticized comrade Mao personally too . The CPI ( M ) leaders too did not recognized comrade Mao teachings and Mao as one of the Great Teachers . They did not recognize him as a great teacher . After the death of comrade Mao , the Chinese revisionist leaders also followed Kruschev-Breznev path . They transformed it as a capitalist country and a social imperialist country . As the Dengist group sensed the grave opposition towards the Secret Report tabled by Kruschev on Stalin , On the one hand it was following the revisionist policies and on the other hand praising comrade Mao . For their existence and to safeguard their communist veil they have been praising and advocating Mao contrary to their previous practice .
Even after the lessons drawn from developments of Russia and Eastern European countries the leaders of these two parties are supporting Chinese social
September - 2018 imperialists . But they are not getting at all ready for making self criticism for their earlier policies . Hence though CPI and CPI ( M ) have a basic agreement between them , they are not uniting into a single party . Sometimes they are unable to work jointly even in the joint programmes . In 1997 itself our party- CPI ( M-L ) New Democracy concluded that these are not only the revisionist parties , but also transformed as ruling class parties . Hence our party does not recognize them as the left parties : not only that our party opines that it is not correct to either consider these parties as socialist parties or treat them as the parties but wish socialist revolution as well .
These two parties are against for class struggles ; these parties dead against to transform class struggles as the tool for armed revolts , or to develop armed struggles : our party opines that all those callsnationwide bandh aims , agitations , processions , militant struggles , joint action calls , joint action movements are all being done with an aim nothing but to score electoral victories . So our party is against to recognize these parties as left parties , and to have joint action and joint front with them in a general way . Our party is not against to have participate joint activities on the emergency issues of the people . At the same context , as a part of utilising conflicts and contradictions among the ruling class parties , depending on the nature of issues and the needs our party is not against to take joint action along with these parties on selected issues . While taking joint action we must select such issues that mobilise large number of people into streets : our party also opines that the joint actions should not be confined nearly for debates in the offices , meetings of big leaders , agitations and processions . Having seen 50 years of their revisionist practice , their rule in some states , their rule within the UF governments , our party opines to consider these parties to be part of communist movement by revolutionary parties will bring harm to the Indian revolutionary movement . Give priority for joint action among Revolutionary organizations and Ranks
The CPI ( M-L ) Central committee in its Key Note document hoped , “... Our presence at a forum like this would help us to find a common ground in the present situation and thus having long-term sustaining united action among us against the ruling classes and their policies . This we hope would instill the spirit of struggle among the people and rank and file ”. Our party opine that it would have been usefull to promote the strength and capabilities of communist revolutionary movement had you held the national seminar along with the CR ’ s with a view of protracted and sustainable joint action on related issues instead of holding this seminar with CPI , CPI ( M ) and other parties .
As the revolutionaries could not form into a single party all the revolutionary supporters are in a deep
15