Canadian Musician - March/April 2019 | Page 59

RECORDING Dajaun Martineau is a producer/engineer/writer based out of Toronto, who spent the better part of a decade as a Senior Staff Engineer at Phase One Studios before going freelance. For his full discography and more information, visit www.dajaun.com. By Dajaun Martineau 4 Things That Haven’t Changed in 40 Years of Recording P eople are always excited about the next new thing – the new piece of gear, the newest recording technique... Occasion- ally, new genres of music seemingly pop into existence from nowhere, and from time to time, they die off. (Remember bebop?) Despite being in a fluid art and industry that is constantly growing and changing, there are a few things that have remained the same over the last 40 years. Distortion A British music storeowner once tasked his amp tech with cloning the popular Fender Bassman. The owner’s plan was sell an inexpensive no-name version for a higher profit. While scrounging for parts, repair tech Ken Bran decided to swap out some of the American parts for ones more readily available in Britain. The British components gave the preamp significantly more gain than the Fend- er amps, and the distorted amps quickly became popular with the local bands looking for a new sound. The storeowner branded the amps with his name; Marshall was born and some of those local bands became icons of rock. And it’s not just guitarists who’ve embraced distortion. Early distortion was unavoidable and could be introduced at every stage of the record- ing process. Throw too much air at a microphone and you would have capsule distortion. Turn the preamp too high and you would end up with signal distortion from overloading. Cut a vinyl too hot and you would get needle distortion; print to tape too hot and you would get tape distortion. Now we work mostly in digital environments and can theoretically create distortion-free music, but it has become so much a part of the sound of modern music that I don’t think it will ever leave. We use limiters and compressors “improperly” to overload the inputs and get that sweet distorted sound on vocals, drums, and synthesizers. Tape and preamp emulations have become widely popular as they recreate the familiar distorted tone print making music sound “right” to our ears. Al- most everything is distorted in one way or another these days. Even digital distortion has become popular in modern production, with bit crushers used in every genre of music to do everything from making a shaker sound bigger to giving vocal tracks a unique tone print. Don’t believe me? Try lowering the sample rate and bit rate on a shaker. Trust me; you’ll love it. The Yamaha NS-10 Yamaha’s NS-10s were originally designed and released in 1978 as domestic “bookshelf” speakers. Their release was considered a failure, as the public did not enjoy what they heard. Still, a few pairs made their way into Japanese recording studios. Greg Ladanyi, known for his work with Fleetwood Mac and Toto, fell in love with the monitors while working in Japan and brought a pair back to California with him. From there, they spread like wildfire, usurping the Auratone 5C as the new standard reference monitor in studios. It is by no means a flat reference monitor; it is lacking in bass and has a midrange boost, but there is something very unique about the NS-10 that lets them highlight flaws in any mix. Despite massive leaps in technology, count- less A-list engineers still swear by these now 40-year-old monitors. Synthesis & Sampling Most of us think of synthesizers as the old “new thing.” You may associate the word itself with bad hairstyles and questionable clothing choices. The reality, though, is that they are so fully integrated into the modern music industry that we will never be free of them. While there were early achievements in synthesis as far back as 1876 with the “Musical Telegraph” and advancements like additive synthesis occurring as early as 1901 in the “Telharmonium,” the first commercially available synthesizer hit in the mid-‘60s when Robert Moog developed Harald Bode’s modular synthesizer concept into a product that could be manufactured and used by musicians in a way they would understand. It wasn’t long after this that the synth market exploded and that MIDI, a standard format for all synthesizers to communicate, was introduced. Even the modern concept of sampling – stor- ing a sound and playing it back on demand – has been around since the ‘60s. The Mellotron had ev- ery key attached to a tape head, and when a key was pressed, the head would hit the tape to play the recorded sample. In 1969, digital sampling became available with the creation of the EMS Music System. Over the next four decades, sampling technology be- came so advanced that some samplers have be- come fully-formed DAWs, and it is hard to discern the difference between a sampler and a DAW at this point. When you really dig into the history, the line becomes blurred and you realize a keyboard controlling tape heads and a computer playing a sequence of sounds are not that different at all. The way that synthesis and sampling have evolved over the last 40 years is impressive, but they are still essentially the same fundamental processes. The Shure SM57 Originally released in 1965, the SM57 has design roots that go all the way back to 1937, when an engineer named Benjamin Bauer designed the first single-element directional microphone. The SM57 is now a staple of recording technology and you can bet that you’ll find this microphone in every studio and production room around the world. There are a few key elements that contribute to its success. The first is that it is just a rugged microphone. People have joked time and time again that a 57 could be used as a hammer in a pinch, and speaking of taking a pounding, the SM57 has an incredibly high SPL rating. In the 1 kHz frequency range, the microphone can handle up to 160dB without distorting. NASA measured the space shuttle launch at around 180 dB at a distance of 10 m, so nothing in a studio should ever get that loud. The high SPL handling allowed engineers to place the microphone much closer to snare drums and guitar amps than ever before. Plus, the mic provides a tight cardioid pattern that rejects sounds coming from the back and sides. A highly directional, durable microphone that can handle big volume, it’s no wonder the 57 has been a studio staple for the last 40 years. Throughout my career, I have constantly heard about the differences between the “old music industry” and the “new music industry,” but in re- ality, it’s one, constantly evolving thing. I expect the industry to look very different 40 years from now, but some things will never change. I can’t say for certain that the things I’ve listed here will last another 40 years, but it’s impressive to see how far they’ve come to date. CANADIAN MUSICIAN 59