Canadian Musician - March/April 2019 | Page 58

WRITING Based in Toronto, Michael Davidson is an in-demand vibraphonist and composer in the improvised, jazz, and creative music scenes. In 2017, he was one of three finalists for the Toronto Arts Foundation’s Emerging Jazz Artist Award. He and bassist Dan Fortin have just released their first duo album, Clock Radio. For more information, visit www.michaeldavidsonmusic.com and www.elasticrecordings.com. By Michael Davidson Musical Architecture & Recursive Systems A composition can be thought of as a piece of musical architecture. I will extend this to include improvisation, which historically has not been award- ed the same legitimacy. A good composition, song, or improvisation has a strong, inherently simple idea at its core. Without this simplicity, nothing can be built upon it. I do not mean that it has to be simple in a literal or derivative way, i.e one chord, a trite melody, or a predictable rhythm. Linking sim- plicity directly with style can yield a less than satisfactory end result. Instead, by simple, I mean: • It is clearly and eloquently presented, and • It can act as a vehicle for creative and im- provisational growth. The clearest way to present a compellingly simple idea might be through one chord. It might also be a structure that appears more complex on the surface. It is important for a composer to be aware of this more than their desire to write a piece in a certain style. • It can be limiting and potentially destructive to link simplicity with a specific style. One element of this concept is the notion that a pop song is inherently simple, or the idea that a pop song is based on a certain type of sim- plicity that cannot be achieved in other “styles.” Someone could consciously try and write a song with this pretense, and end up with a nebulous idea far from being clearly and eloquently stated. The construct of style is a drain on energy that otherwise could be put into clarity of thought and flow of ideas. Without this clarity, a song is a hollow struc- ture with no foundation. Despite the best efforts of interpreters, it will inevitably implode. • Simplicity is clarity, and has nothing to do with style. • It is embedded in an evolutionary process. • Without it, there is no impetus for growth. 58 CANADIAN MUSICIAN Improvisation, Composition & Accidents When engaged in the process of writing a song, I am conscious of that initial idea. As an improviser, I am fascinated by the structure of a compelling improvisation and how that can become the basis for a composition. I look at it from multiple perspectives, reflect on its contours, and cultivate a space where accidents may happen frequently. By accidents, I mean spontaneous and wholly unplanned emergences of unforeseen materials or shapes. These accidents are to be embraced quickly and not discarded. They work to form the basis of my recorded intuition. Ideas can take many shapes and branch off into multiple songs or improvisations. One clearly stated idea can yield a number of compositions as it provides an opening for growth and change. Through the shaping, certain vehicles prove less effective for presenting the core material, and they fall to the background or link up with an- other idea at the core of some other piece. This process requires an openness and commitment to fully explore a concept and consider it from different perspectives. • A position of openness is imperative. Recursion  I’m committed to this process of growth or evo- lution, and consider it a recursive process with mutations. We start with a clearly articulated idea that within it has an elegant yet elusive code for something. Our mind layers things upon it, copies of the original idea shaped by the wake of our thoughts and feelings. As these copies come in contact with other thoughts and streams of consciousness, they change ever so slightly. Over time and through reflection, these slight changes add up. This can happen in a moment or over many moments. Along the way, you may find multiple ways to represent these ideas, some appearing almost effortlessly while others remain more elusive. As a composer and improviser, I am endlessly finding flexible shapes to represent clear ideas and feel- ings. This, along with a position of openness, is at the core of my creative process. It is vital to not get attached to these shapes as they are discovered. • Don’t get attached to your ideas! What started as a tiny fragment has become a beautifully, spontaneously crafted piece of con- sciousness that we call a song. As the process compounds, songs make their way into the world should we choose to share them. These songs are a bi-product of this recursive process. The real joy is in the process. Each song or improvisation has some of the process embedded in it. When we play the song, the imprint of this can show its face, bringing a quality of spontaneity and life to the air that has nothing to do with style. We are invited to confront the intuition of the composer with our own intuition. A great song or improvisation has a process built into it, offers an architecture for commu- nication, and is an ecosystem of thoughts and feelings. The moment I get too attached to one idea, the process is interrupted or ended. We should still focus on specific interpretations of the material but must recognize these are part of a larger shape, a larger body of work, of energy, of clarity and expression. Along the way, beautifully crafted structures emerge, yet unlike those built of stone, these structures continue to be flexible and evolve over time without decay. For further reading that explores these concepts, check out: • I Am a Strange Loop by Douglas Hofstadter • The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams For visual art that embodies these concepts, check out the work of: • M.C. Escher • Emily Carr