Campus Review Volume 28 Issue 12 December 2018 | Page 15

industry & research campusreview.com.au Cool hand spook Is China’s international scientist recruitment program just a cover for IP theft? By Loren Smith D o you remember the American corn seed heist of 2013? More kernel than caper, Mo Hailong and six other Chinese nationals were accused of digging up patented GMO corn seeds from Iowa farms and, once concealed in boxes of microwaveable popcorn, attempting to smuggle them to China. In 2016, Hailong was convicted and jailed for three years, for conspiracy to steal trade secrets. Some of his accomplices remain at large. While no connection was found between the group and the Chinese government, given the high level of government involvement in Chinese business, the case added to US anxieties over China stealing its intellectual property. These have yet to be allayed, and indeed, have grown. The latest occurrence to irk the US government concerns China’s 2008-established Thousand Talents program – a government recruitment drive aimed mostly at attracting foreign- trained Chinese scientists back to their 16 home country to accelerate innovation. ‘Basic qualifications’ for candidates include “people under 55 years of age who are willing to work in China on a full-time basis, with full professorships or the equivalent in prestigious foreign universities and R&D institutes, or with senior titles from well-known international companies or financial institutions”. Most of its roughly 7000 recruits have been from the US. As the China-US trade war has escalated, however, the US government has become increasingly suspicious of China’s motives in regard to the program. In a July 2018 Statement before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the former chief executive of Symantec, Michael A. Brown, testified that “some of the technology transfer mechanisms China engages in include industrial espionage, cyber theft, forced joint ventures in exchange for access to the Chinese market, tracking of open-source innovations, sponsoring professional organisations to target talent, and using Chinese foreign national students by placing them in sensitive areas of US research”. “Viewed individually, the legal practices may seem benign, but when viewed in combination, and at the scale China is employing them, the composite picture illustrates the intent, design and dedication of a regime focused on technology transfer at a massive scale.” He gave the example of American Superconductor – a company that provided the software code, or “brains”, of wind turbines to China. China paid one of its employees in exchange for access to the company’s valuable code. Although Brown didn’t explicitly refer to the Thousand Talents program, a June 2018 White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy report did, but was cautious in its wording: it provided that China poached top, homegrown talent “who may [emphasis added] hold intellectual property rights, key technologies, or patents in technological fields desired by China”. The FBI was more blunt: “Chinese talent programs pose a serious threat to US businesses and universities through economic espionage and theft of intellectual property.” Consequently, the US is now acting to hinder these efforts. In May, President Donald Trump announced that visas issued to Chinese students in fields including aviation, robotics and advanced manufacturing would be reduced from five years to one. Universities, too, are responding. In September, Texas Tech University's vice-president for research, Joseph Heppert, publicly instructed academics “to be very circumspect about participation in talent programs”. He had reason for this warning: in October, NBC News reported that the FBI was investigating Keping Xie, a gastroenterology professor at the University of Texas, in relation to espionage, and that Xie had taken part in the Thousand Talents program. A further worrisome aspect of the program is its alleged links with the Chinese military. “The State Department and the FBI believe elements of the Thousand Talents program are closely allied to the Chinese military,” Heppert stated. Whether or not this is true, collaboration between offshore Chinese scientists, including in Australia, and China’s military has been verified. A recent report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) revealed that Australia is the fourth most collaborative nation with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) – China’s armed forces. On a per capita