Campus Review Volume 27. Issue 06 | June 17 | Page 17

campusreview.com.au antidepressants – they are more likely to be overweight, have diabetes, smoke, use multiple drugs, use illicit drugs and drink alcohol. Virtually all of those we know have potentially negative outcomes on pregnancy. You have to control for all of these things; some studies do, some studies don't. Immediately you have these biases and meta- analyses try to overcome – as best they can depending on the information given – these issues. The meta-analysis that we’re talking about [was done] because over time we get more and more data, so they have – unlike previous ones – more data access. They were fairly rigorous with excluding ones where they didn't think the methodology was adequate. You also have to take into account how many babies with cardiac defects are born; it’s roughly eight for every 1000 deliveries. Their outcomes show that if you take fluoxetine, it gives you a slightly increased risk of having a baby with a cardiac malformation. [This outcome] is not a surprise, because some of those studies they analysed also found that. What it is doing is just giving more weight to that. It's not something we didn't know about; we've known about fluoxetine. There have been other studies, including ones they used, that found fluoxetine to be problematic. I would have issue with their belief that, for an Australian population, fluoxetine is the most commonly prescribed one in pregnancy. We haven't been doing that – certainly, perinatal psychiatrists in Victoria or Australia-wide haven't been doing that – for some time. We don't use it because of the findings we already knew about, and also because of its long half-life. We really don't want to expose the babies in pregnancy and post-partum in particular if they want to breastfeed, with something that's difficult to change because it hangs around so long. I think the other important thing with this study is that, yes, there is an increased relative risk, but it is still quite low. Their meta-analysis is still not perfect. For instance, some of the studies they used did calculate for alcohol use, some did not. If you just looked at the studies that did allow for alcohol usage, the relative risk rate went down from, I think, 1.3 to 1.18. That sort of shows that by controlling for these confounding variables it can alter that risk rate. In lay terms, that means that for every 100 women that have a baby with a cardiac defect – every 100 women not taking antidepressants – there will be 118 or 130, depending on which figures you're looking at, that will have a cardiac defect. You also have to take into account how many babies with cardiac defects are born; it’s roughly eight for every 1000 deliveries. So again, to get 100 women not taking antidepressants to have babies with cardiac defects, we're talking about a lot of births. It has to be put into that context. What might these defects constitute in terms of a major defect and a cardiovascular defect? They're only pinpointing cardiovascular ones as being linked to fluoxetine, although this group broadly does increase risk because of those compounding variables. The cardiac ones are two types: one is the septal defects, which are the holes in the heart, and INDUSTRY & RESEARCH many of those holes in the heart are very minor and don't need any intervention and fix themselves by adulthood. The non-septal defects can be more serious, and these are ones with problems with valves and the actual vessels of the heart. They can require surgery and potentially be not compatible with life. So there is the full range, but many of those septal defects are at the minor end. I also just want to add that the thing that needs to be taken into account for the women who have to balance this risk, and for the doctors that are trying to advise them, is that being unwell in pregnancy – so being off medication and unwell – actually constitutes a risk as well. We also know women don't look after themselves if they're unwell, and therefore they won't be looking after their pregnancy; they won't be eating well, either not putting on weight or putting on too much weight, smoking more – all of those things which will impact on the health of the fetus. Also, we know that very anxious women through pregnancy have babies who are born with higher cortisol levels, and that higher cortisol stays with them all their lives, and is probably a marker for later illnesses and mental health disorders in those women. I've noticed that there are also potential risks associated with other types of antidepressants, such as SSRIs. Are they more, less or the same in terms of the risk posed to the fetus? The only two SSRIs that have come up as having a specific risk are paroxetine and fluoxetine. All of the other ones are linked in together with no specific risk attached to them. The increased risk is probably more associated with all those compounding variables, and the other thing that this paper didn't control for and which is largely unknown is dosage. We're looking at probably a big difference between the risks for the fetus if you're taking 20mg of fluoxetine versus taking 80mg of fluoxetine. That exposure is going to be very different. So dose is important to consider as well. Some of the other antidepressants, other than those two I've mentioned, in the SSRIs ... are very clearly safer than fluoxetine and paroxetine. What advice would you give women who are concerned about this analysis? Not to panic. If they are already pregnant, then go see their doctor as soon as possible if they haven't already discussed it with their doctor. Each individual has to weigh up different sets of risks. If someone has become very unwell, unable to work, acutely suicidal when they're depressed, then the risks of being off the medication are going to be much, much greater than staying on it. Those are the sorts of things that ideally you discuss with your doctor before getting pregnant. I do lots of these sorts of consultations to plan these pregnancies, and if, let's say, someone was on fluoxetine, I would look at whether we could switch them to something less risky. What risks would be involved with that? How long is it going to take and is it worth doing? Can we reduce the dose of whatever they’re on? Can we help them lose weight, make sure their diabetes is controlled? Try to help them stop smoking? Do all of the other things as well as just looking at the medication. And making sure they're doing things like yoga, exercising regularly, good sleep habits – all the things that will help maintain a healthy pregnancy. ■ 15