Campus Review Vol 30. Issue 05 | May 2020 | Page 6

news World beaters Aussie universities feature big in THE Impact Rankings. A ustralian universities have dominated a ranking that looks at efforts to solve global challenges. Four top spots in Times Higher Education’s (THE) Impact Rankings were taken up by Australian institutions – a huge jump from last year’s result, as no Australian university appeared in the 2019 top 10. The ranking uses the United Nations’ 17 sustainable development goals to measure the extent to which universities are having a positive social and economic impact on the planet. U21 ranking Australia scores well for environment and output. T he United States has again nabbed the top spot in the ninth and final Universitas 21 ranking. Produced under the leadership of Professor Ross Williams at the University of Melbourne, the ranking evaluates national 4 campusreview.com.au Last year, Australia’s top performer was Western Sydney University, debuting at 11. It was followed by the University of Wollongong at equal 13, and the University of South Australia at 22. This year, the University of Sydney was Australia’s best (2) – up from 25 last year – but was pipped at the post by the University of Auckland, which nabbed the pole position for the second year running. USyd performed particularly well in the ‘sustainable cities and communities’ and ‘decent work and economic growth’ goals. Vice-chancellor Dr Michael Spence said: “The contribution universities make has never been more important – with climate change, unprecedented bushfires and the coronavirus affecting us all.” Explaining its success, the university pointed to its work on keeping local Indigenous languages from extinction and on a report that explores the sometimes illegal arrangements emerging in parts of Sydney in response to unmet housing need, as well as a trip by students last year to Pune, India, to work on artificial intelligence to address air pollution, water management and drought, along with events like the Sydney Summit II, which focused on sustainable development goals. Sydney Environment Institute director Professor David Schlosberg said the university’s forthcoming sustainability strategy – expected this year – would make its work in this area more visible to the campus community and “put some of our best research into practice in the everyday life of the campus”. Rounding out 2020’s top three was Western Sydney University, which was followed by La Trobe University at number 4. Australia’s other top 10 finisher was RMIT University (10). The United States typically dominates higher education rankings, yet only three US universities ranked in the 2020 top 100. Arizona State University (5) gave the country its only top 10 result. This is the first year the Impact Rankings recognised all 17 sustainable development goals, up from 11 last year. In the 17 individual SDG Rankings, 16 universities from nine nations took out number one positions, including China, the US, Ireland, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Canada and the UK.  ■ systems of higher education rather than individual universities. It zeroes in on a system’s resources, the environment, connectivity and output by examining a number of institutions within a nation. Australia was named in the top 10 on the list but trailed leaders like second-placed Switzerland and third-placed Denmark, as well as Singapore, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Canada and Finland. The Netherlands rounded out the top 10. It was a slip of one position from its place on the 2019 instalment. Williams said that over the last decade the ranking has tracked the movement to international connectiveness in higher education and its positive effect on national performance. “Domestic links with the private sector and other external stakeholders are also important,” he said. “National systems that are inward-looking flounder.” He also noted the strong relationship between increases in research funding and measurable increases in research performance after three or four years. “The project has demonstrated that international connectivity increases the impact of research – knowledge of the research is expanded [and] the researchers become better known and are thus linked into new international research projects and findings.” Breaking down the overall list, the top three countries for resources were Norway, Singapore and Switzerland, while the countries with the most favourable environment – scoring well on the diversity and autonomy of their institutions and the extent of external monitoring of institutional performance – were the US, Australia and New Zealand. Australia was also a top performer when looking at output and its impact, coming in at number 3 – up from 4th place last year – after the US and the UK. And when looking at which countries boast institutions with superior connectivity, Switzerland, Austria and Singapore come out on top. Singapore and Denmark gained ground on the overall list compared to their positions last year, climbing three and two places, respectively. After allowing for differences in income levels, the top ranked countries were Finland, South Africa and the UK.  ■