Campus Review Vol 30. Issue 05 | May 2020 | Page 14

policy & reform campusreview.com.au First principles Quality shouldn’t be overlooked in the rush to deliver classes online. By Tom Whitford R ecent examinations of COVID-19’s impact on the higher education sector do nothing to support the most honest of educators and teachers who seek to support students fairly and innovatively. This is not a question of resourcing, or institutional strategy, but rather a needed return to the basic question of what makes for good, high quality teaching. Many lifelong higher-educators may even be humbled by the recent focus being placed on teaching, and the renewed commitment to ensuring staff are 12 supported with professional development in the past month. It has been thrilling to witness our learning organisations – the modern day university – become virtual ‘overnight’. This is captivating for someone who both researches online teaching transition and is also passionate about the opportunity that the online environment affords us at this moment. As an early-career social scientist, I also think about my peers who would all be fascinated by what this unique moment in history means for not just society, but our own institutions. Think about what this demands of a sector that prides itself on more tangible benefits: the collegial activities on campus for students, the lectures from global visiting professors, the world-class facilities and laboratories. These serve an important marketing function, but I think no one could ever predict how integral these are for a university’s sense of purpose. Almost instantly, many of these have been shuttered, which has been heartbreaking for a sector that has rushed to build capacity in their campuses during the boom of international student revenue. It is also disarming for the cities that house us, and the important social ramifications for our temporary student residents. There are also rumblings from the student body, with concerns about the uneven online educational offering, and media coverage emerging on the promises of an educational experience that cannot be delivered upon remotely. For now, most frontline teaching academics are struggling to navigate the new demands placed on them, and trying to adapt quickly to this new virtual campus. The extra burden of the online teaching experience is a steep learning curve for most. Think about video guides, tutorials for online platforms, and how to best communicate with students who may be distant or abroad in other time zones. Koehler and Mishra spoke of the TPACK model barely over a decade ago, and the increased requirements of the traditional academic given increased virtualisation of practice (2009). That is, a comprehensive knowledge and skill set that spans not just content knowledge, but technological and pedagogical prowess. To summarise: knowing our in-depth areas of specialisation, knowing how to best teach, and how the technology can best support this learning. This is an accurate premonition for the current time; many of us currently teaching feel stretched across these domains, or switching between layers of expertise or competency. While universities – much like many professional and corporate organisations – may be currently adjusting to remote delivery of service, we have a unique take on who our students are, and what they want. For many years we have embraced market-orientation, mostly due to the federal policy and funding landscape which has supported the scalar growth in student numbers, both domestic and foreign. And during this period, many universities have accommodated these larger numbers through increasing their teaching function, swelling the numbers of their teaching portfolios and the programs offered. Many universities, it appears, have resourced this growth with a reliance on casual or sessional staff. Ignoring the debates around industrial ethics and HR integrity – for the most part – this army of casual academics have performed their jobs admirably. Taking on large numbers of students, overbearing themselves with marking loads, justifying an unstable and insecure position