Campus Review Vol 30. Issue 05 | May 2020 | Page 13

policy & reform campusreview.com.au technology will certainly continue to be used to support collaboration, but that it will still need to be balanced with ensuring we have the opportunity to see our colleagues in person and continue to have that human contact with our teammates. informal conversations and that human interaction will continue to be an important part of our wellbeing. You also mentioned in the article that, while it’s too early to judge how most people are dealing with WFH, there seem to be three distinct types of people. It will depend on the industry and the type of work that people do. For workers who don’t need to be on-site every day to do their job, then yes, I expect that into the future, there will be wider opportunities for those workers to work from home. I think particularly as many organisations will now have been able to see just how effective working from home can be, and that people can be just as productive working from a home office as from a traditional office. The sorts of workers I’m particularly thinking about are those white-collar office job type of workers. But post-pandemic, I think there’ll obviously be jobs where the nature of the work doesn’t lend itself quite as easily to working from home. So, for example, workers who still need to have a daily interaction with customers or clients or patients. I’m thinking healthcare workers, teachers, maybe people in warehousing distribution, or those in retail hospitality that are particularly customer-facing. So, I think industry and type of work will play an important role in determining what WFH looks like into the future. But also, the pandemic has required many businesses to think a bit more seriously and reassess their cost and overhead. So one cost many businesses have is real estate – the cost of leasing office space. Many businesses might look to lower those office space costs and potentially reduce the amount of office space they have. One way they could do that is by continuing to encourage some WFH practices and perhaps think more creatively about the type of workspace they need for their business. I think workers generally fall into three broad categories regarding their preferences for working from home and their experiences of it. Some people find it hard to create office space – maybe their home space simply has too many distractions to be able to work effectively. Especially in the context of this pandemic, some workers, me included, need to manage home-schooling and childcare alongside part-time or full-time paid employment, and that can certainly be challenging. So going to an office can make it easier to get work done. Some people prefer a clear demarcation between work life and home life, and the best way for them to generate that is to have an office to go to every day to get their work done. So for people in this category, their preference will probably continue to be going to the traditional office every day. But another category of people have probably fallen in love with working from home, and for them that short walk to the home office or desk is probably much preferred to the hour-long or maybe even longer daily commute to an office space. So they’re probably also enjoying that flexibility of starting and finishing their work when they’re most productive in the day, and they might find that their home office actually has fewer distractions than a traditional office. So they can work better and get more done when they’re at home. These people also enjoy how WFH flexibility allows them to better manage their work as well as their other life responsibilities. I think, for most of us, we fit into the third category: people who are keen to get the best of both worlds. That is, to get those WFH benefits I just mentioned, particularly around that flexibility of when and how work is done, but also to have the benefits of being able to go into an office. Some of these benefits can include just being able to see our colleagues and have a chat with them, which we can’t do in person at the moment. But having those Many people have argued that COVID-19 will change our work lives forever. Do you think WFH practices are here to stay? Productivity is always the key surrounding WFH practices and policies. But are there other impacts, say, on individuals and communities, that we need to consider? Absolutely. Productivity is one aspect, but there are many others to be mindful of. For example, it’s important to ensure that workers are not experiencing a blurring of those lines between what is home time and what is work time. Particularly when we work from home, it can be easy to keep the work email open or keep the work laptop on and say, “Oh, I’ll just finish this after dinner.” But we know that adopting a 24/7 mentality to work does not support good physical and mental wellbeing. So there need to be clear expectations for managers about when work starts and stops and ensuring that there isn’t that blurring between home time and personal time, because workers still need to have that time away from work. Conversely, workers need to be supported in developing an effective WFH routine. That links a little bit to productivity. For example, when we’re at home, it can be easy to get distracted by other things, like getting the washing done, talking to family members or playing with the dog. Interestingly, I was talking to a colleague last week and he said one of his challenges in working from home was social distancing, not necessarily from people, but social distancing from the fridge. Maybe some of us can relate to that! It’s important that organisations don’t just assume that people will automatically find a routine when they work from home, or even necessarily find it an easy thing to do. So, I think it’s important that organisations don’t just assume that people will automatically find a routine when they work from home, or even necessarily find it an easy thing to do, particularly if they’ve never done it before. Organisations might need to step in there and provide some guidance and strategies to help their workers create the WFH routine that is best for them. On a positive note, I think we may see some more personal and community wide benefits from a broader shift to working from home. For example, when people can cut out that long daily commute to an office, suddenly they find they have more time and energy to get involved in things like local neighbourhood activities or meeting up with friends, exercise, taking the kids to the sports field, and so on. So we might find that people suddenly have more time and space to engage in connection-based, community-oriented activities. Those are great for supporting both personal and community wellbeing.  ■ 11