BrandKnew September 2013 March 2014 | Page 11

groupisd.com 10 Birchbox and Quarterly.co Birchbox, a company that sends out monthly boxes of beauty and grooming supplies, claims more than 400,000 regular subscribers just three years after launch. Its European sister site Glossybox grew to similar popularity in an even shorter period of time. More recently, Quarterly.co has taken the subscription concept a step further, delivering products every three months picked by a range of curators, including style expert Nina Garcia and Make Magazine founder Mark Frauenfelder, or brands like quirky L.A.-based Poketo. TODAY’S SMARTEST BRANDS KNOW HOW TO LEVERAGE BOTH THE POWER OF ANALOG AND OUR DESIRE TO CHANNEL OUR INNER HANDYMAN. What’s remarkable about these, and dozens of other product subscription services is that they’ve convinced people to lay down serious money--sometimes several hundred dollars a year--for goods that someone else is choosing, which runs counter to the customer-is-in-control mantra we so often hear. The thrill of discovery is part of the appeal, but there’s also the thrill of not having to decide: when you’re bogged down by decision fatigue, latching onto a person or brand whose choices you trust can feel like liberation. Even if you have no use for a box of candy-colored paper straws. REPAIR AND REPURPOSE ARE THE NEXT KILLER APPS The recent proliferation of makerspaces, hackathons, and DIY-oriented events like Maker Faire suggests that repairing and repurposing are being actively embraced as mainstream pursuits--not just a way to be frugal, but a form of expression and creativity. At the same time, we see increasing evidence of analog technology’s appeal, even when it’s driven by digital media, as evidenced by the wild popularity of Instagram and the continued growth of the vinyl record industry. Today’s smartest brands know how to leverage both the power of analog and our desire to channel our inner handyman. The Vamp The Vamp is a device that resurrects dead speakers, which isn’t as strange as it sounds. Essentially a small, batterypowered amp with Bluetooth reception, the cube-shaped Vamp is designed to sit on top of an old speaker and feed the speaker signals received from your smartphone or laptop. TECH COMPANIES TRY TO BEST COMPETITORS WITH THE FASTEST PROCESSOR OR THE HIGHESTRESOLUTION DISPLAY. MOST CONSUMERS DON’T REALLY CARE. The device’s Kickstarter video features its designer, Londonbased Paul Cocksedge, professing his love for old, boxy audio gear, and appealing to the hacker and tinker in us all, as well as that jolt of eco-satisfaction we all get when rescuing something from the garbage heap. The campaign has been an unqualified success, raising three times its initial funding goal. TECHNOLOGY MOVES TOO FAST TO CARE ABOUT It’s all too easy for tech companies to mindlessly chase superlatives--to try to best competitors with the fastest processor or the highest-resolution display. The thing is, most consumers don’t really care. As we wrote earlier this year, “The Internet runs on an alphabet soup of languages and protocols, and only a slim population of early adopters count pixels or processor speeds anymore. The rest of us just want to know what it’s like to use.” Moto X The Motorola/Google partnership that produced the Moto X smartphone is remarkable for several reasons, including the phone’s “always on” voice recognition, the unique Motomaker interface that allows shoppers to customize it before ordering, and the fact that it’s assembled in the United States. But one of its most striking features is what it doesn’t have: an ultra-high-res display. Just three years earlier, Apple wowed the technology world by doubling the resolution on the iPhone 4, calling the result “Retina display.” Digital cameras experienced a similar trend in the early 2000s, with manufacturers racing to cram in more and more megapixels, until image sizes became gargantuan, tech writers started to rebel, and manufacturers began to rein in their resolutions. Yet when the Moto X was released last year with a resolution of “only” 1280 x 720 pixels, critics were quick to call it out as a liability when held up to higher-res competitors like the HTC One or Samsung’s Galaxy S4.