BOOM September Issue | Page 28

REPORT The trundling ways of the Lux Style Awards J ust when you were wondering if they would ever surface, the Lux Style Awards (LSAs) nominations for 2014 were announced, bringing with them the usual spate of wounded egos, controversy and tirades. The Television nominations particularly have come under fire, with the initial list excluding Geo TV’s Bashar Momin from the Best Satellite Play category and the lion’s share of nominations being dedicated to ARY Digital. Subsequently, Faysal Quraishi was nominated as Best Actor for his role in 'Bashar Momin' only for the actor to refuse the nomination, complaining openly on social media of the “bias within a once very prestigious award.” Other contenders, specifically productions by Hum TV, have also blatantly backed out.Meanwhile, the cinematic categories reflect the growth within local cinema, pitting the commercial hit Na Maloom Afraad against the not-so-successful Operation O21 and thought-provoking Dukhtar. However, eyebrows have been raised because of the omission of Mohib Mirza for Dukhtar in the Best Film Actor nominations while Ayub Khosa has been recognised for a role in Operation O21 that didn’t impress many. This year also marks the apt return of the bridal fashion category to the LSAs. It’s a long overdue change: bridal fashion has thankfully become more experimental and bridal events consistently dot the local fashion roster. Also welcome is the elimination of the confusing High Street category which endlessly got confused with Pret and Luxury-pret. The fashion nominations uncharacteristically remain non-controversial although one does notice the omission of some seasoned players. Khaadi’s ready-to-wear, winner of 10 Luxies thus far, is no longer in the running now that the ‘High Street’ category has been eliminated. The brand does figure in the unstitched lawn nominations, though.Debates inevitably follow the nomination announcements and though they continue to be riveting, it’s fast becoming difficult to get excited about the LSAs. For how does one associate credibility with a platform that refuses to take itself seriously? The high-tea that took place last year — an ‘understated, elegant affair’, as described by the LSA organisers — couldn’t possibly compare to the grandiose galas of previous years.The LSA platform has been built brick by brick