AV News Magazine | Page 4

AV News 187 - February 2012 Editorial Jill K Bunting CPAGB & John Smith APAGB CPAGB A Happy New Year to all our readers! A new year often means change and sometimes new ways of looking at things. Both the RPS and PAGB are in the process of redefining the criteria for their individual distinctions in AV. The inaugral six members of the new RPS Multimedia & Narrative panel have met to decide on the criteria they will adopt and are to hold an Advisory Day on Wednesday 29th February. The first adjudication is on Wednesday 4th April, both to be held in Fenton House, Bath at 10.30am. All their recommendations will then have to go before the Distictions Advisory Board for approval. The PAGB decided to provide an on-line survey and to ask the opinion of the 'AV fraternity' regarding certain aspects of their proposed criteria - this survey it was felt would assist them in coming to a more informed decision at their February meeting. We hope that you took part and gave your views. The thorny problem of Pre-selection certainly caused a number of letters to come in both for and against. Here are a few interesting comments: 'Entrants who have spent many months preparing their entry need to know why they have failed to reach an acceptable level of production'. 'Surely it is not beyond the whit of man to tick a few columns on a sheet to help the punters and why not limit entries to one per person? Are all these suggestions impossible to implement or is it that they come from outsiders? The answers, 'There have been several suggestions recently on how we could improve our methods of pre-selection. This is a more complex and complicated procedure than is realised if one has not actually taken part. We have thought of alternative methods - for example regional selection. We will continue to consider and if viable, adopt any further alterations to our procedures'. 'Obviously there are bound to be many dissapointments and possibly some system could be designed to provide disappointed entrants with more information, but by exposing their work as much as possible from club level to RPS regional groups they would gather informed feedback which is absolutely invaluable.' Interestingly these comments were taken from AV News in 1985!! So what are our own views on this matter - the Championships are over but maybe we can learn from them and move forward. With the current economic climate, the cost of entering and attending festivals needs to be looked into and maybe cheaper alternatives and procedures adopted. If someone is unsucessful then as a courtesy they should at least be told why, a proportion of their entry fee refunded and if that is not possible, then invite them to attend some or all of the sessions free of charge so that they can see just what the accepted standard is. Why are we so passionate about this? We spend a great deal of time visititing clubs encouraging and spreading the gospel of AV. These newcomers are the future of AV - we need to encourage them. Page 2