AV News Magazine | Page 8

AV News 189 - August 2012 The final submission shown was very different, The statement of intent described graphically a situation which led the photographer to make her presentation. The submission was presented as a video file, in essence it showed most of the features of an AV, and was categorised by the RPS as 'multimedia'. Whatever it was, it shone out. Hopefully you will be able to see it on the RPS website, but it comprises a shortish 'film' of a bus ride, possibly shot using a phone camera (you'd have to have been very brave to have waved a 'proper camera' in that situation), with a soundtrack in Italian, subtitled in English. The photography is edgy and very much in a contemporary reportage style. Of the 7 submissions seen, the panel unanimously accepted 4, the majority accepted one and two were to go forward to the Fellowship Board without a positive recommendation. The Fellowship Board however had different views and while accepting 3 of the panel's recommendations, did not accept 4 of their recommendations. They did agree, however, to award one an LRPS instead of an ARPS. One candidate who failed to get Board approval was advised that "...the Board felt that the level of photography was below the required standard. Whilst it is not expected that every image can be of 'A' standard, the Board were looking for more imagination and a higher level of 'seeing' in the production..." However, four applicants, from the eight, were successful and should be highly congratulated in their achievement. They were: LRPS - Jane Blanchard - Moving Image; Raymond Hughes - Audio Visual ARPS - Simon Sherwin - Multimedia; Yvonne de Rosa - Multimedia So what of the way forward? John Chamberlin, as panel Chairman, observed that "...The Society recognises it was especially difficult for both applicants and panel members at this first assessment, as we were working very much in the dark.. Certainly I and the panel members are now much clearer about the standard of both Licentiateship and Associateship levels, so there is now a better basis on which to work...". Page 6