AV News Magazine | Página 7

AV News 189 - August 2012 And Now For Something Very Different.... Howard Bagshaw ARPS MPAGB Any form of change is difficult, and so it has proved to be with the awarding of RPS AV distinctions. The last Audio Visual distinctions were awarded in October 2009 and following this the RPS established a new panel to award distinctions in 'Multimedia and Narrative'. Following an advisory day in February this year, the first distinctions panel met on 21st May at Fenton House in Bath to evaluate submissions based on new criteria. The panel was chaired by John Chamberlin and comprised Richard Brown, Keith Brown, Peter Hayes and Graham Sergeant (all FRPS). Around 20 applicants and observers were in the audience to see 7 of the 8 applications. The other one, was to be seen 'in camera' (nice term for the RPS !!), as it was an interactive presentation of 360 degree panoramas not easily shown to an audience. We started with the LRPS submissions, the first being traditional AV sequences. After each sequence/film/media-event was shown, John Chamberlin invited panel members to comment. This was done in a professional, but relaxed manner, covering the strengths and perceived weaknesses. After seeing all the components of an application, the panel were invited to secretly indicate their initial view of the submission. If there was any difference in views John invited further debate. A final recommendation was made and announced to the audience. Unusually, and probably only for this first run of the panel, all submissions, together with the panel's recommendations were to go to the Fellowship Board, so that standards could be established. The second LRPS submission was in film, four short advert type films, each commercially commissioned. While Richard and Keith had led the discussion on the AVs, Peter and Graham tended to lead on film and multimedia. It seemed clear that both LRPS submissions satisfied the standard and in both cases the panel recommended that the applicant receive their distinction. The ARPS submissions were largely AV based and covered a wide range of subject matter. Before we saw a new applicant's