AUA Why Nations Fail - Daron Acemoglu | Page 447

otherwise. On November 6, they met with him again in London. The chiefs spoke through an interpreter: Chamberlain: I will speak about the lands of the Chiefs, and about the railway, and about the law which is to be observed in the territory of the Chiefs … Now let us look at the map … We will take the land that we want for the railway, and no more. Khama: I say, that if Mr. Chamberlain will take the land himself, I will be content. Chamberlain: Then tell him that I will make the railway myself by the eyes of one whom I will send and I will take only as much as I require, and will give compensation if what I take is of value. Khama: I would like to know how [i.e., where] the railway will go. Chamberlain: It shall go through his territory but shall be fenced in, and we will take no land. Khama: I trust that you will do this work as for myself, and treat me fairly in this matter. Chamberlain: I will guard your interests. The next day, Edward Fairfield, at the Colonial Office, explained Chamberlain’s settlement in more detail: Each of the three chiefs, Khama, Sebele and Bathoen, shall have a country within which they shall live as hitherto under the protection of the Queen. The Queen shall appoint an officer to reside with them. The chiefs will rule their own people much as at present. Rhodes’s reaction to being outmaneuvered by the three African chiefs was predictable. He cabled to one of his employees, saying, “I do object to being beaten by three canting natives.” The chiefs in fact had something valuable that they had protected from Rhodes and would subsequently protect from British indirect rule. By the nineteenth century, the