420
Aptavani-9
Dadashri: Samyak (the real and the right; the state of the
Self). I would investigate what is samyak in it. And then I would
cancel it. After that even if someone tries to instigate it further,
he will not get any response. Many people do say, ‘Dada is
bhoda (guileless).’ But try me out! (Test me!) Dada is the
absolute Self; He cannot be guileless. How can He ever be
bhoda? Would He be guileless? If a Gnani Purush is guileless
then what is the difference between him and a stupid person?
Do you have the ability to analyze this talk? Are you able
to critically appreciate this line of conversation that you are
involved in?
Questioner: One can realize after a lot of experience.
Dadashri: The person who tells you things (the one who
is instrumental in switching the tracks) would not have any
deceitful aggression (prapanch); he is simply speaking out of
idiocy (unaware of the reality of this universe). If that were to
happen to me, there would be a major problem in satsang,
would it not? What is the likelihood of Dada ever believing you
if you were to tell me, ‘Dada this is what happened’?
Questioner: With what adjustment do you not accept
things people tell you?
Dadashri: I would know right away. It’s value and
validity; I can understand everything. I would know from the
moment he starts talking that he is being partial and is trying to
make me take sides. If the Gnani Purush were to become naïve,
then all is lost. He may look guileless (bhoda) and simple. How
can one who does not have trace of deceit (kapat) be guileless
(bhoda)? Where there is guilelessness (bhodpan), there is
deceit (kapat) for sure. Where there is no deceit there is not an
iota of bhodpan.
Questioner: So does guilelessness (bhodpan) exist on
the foundation of deceit (kapat)?