Aptavani-6 Aptavani-6 | Page 290

Aptavani-6 259 spiritual effort) be done. Dada tells us all to think a little about what the world calls purusharth. This Neem tree is bitter in every leaf and in every branch. What is the purusharth of the Neem tree in that? Similarly, where is one’s purusharth when one does all this relative penance (tapa) and when he renounces (tyaag)? One is a spinning ‘top’ (bhammardo; Dadashri calls all humans ‘tops’), so how is he going to do udirana? The ‘top’ is dictated by his prakruti, and he spins according to the karma effect, so how is he going to do udirana? He has not become a purush, the Self, and that is why he is called a ‘top.’ So how can a ‘top’ and udirana go together? Nikachit karma (karma effect one has to suffer) will always be bitter. There is sweet nikachit karma, but eventually when one gets tired of it, it will taste bitter and he will begin to feel that it would be nice if it were to go away. There are two kinds of nikachit karma: one is bitter and the other is sweet. Even too much of a sweet karma becomes an entrapment. If they give you a lot of ice-cream, how much will you eat? Would you not get tired of it too? And during bitter karma, you will get even more tired. You have no choice but suffer it. Nikachit karma means a karma you have no choice but suffer. The other karmas are such that they are easily gotten rid of. It is acceptable to call udirana as penance (tapa). However, that penance is naimittic penance; it is dependant on a nimit (an evidence; apparent doer). Indeed, if one were doing that penance himself, then he is considered to be the doer. That is why it is a naimittic penance. That means that if penance comes to him as part of the fruition of his karma (penance is the evidence), then the karma will go away, but not otherwise. If he tries to do penance, he will say, ‘I will do the penance tomorrow,’