2025 Trends in Med Staff Credentialing Report | Page 16

coordination, while its authoritative status simplifies downstream integrations and enforces clear data governance over provider information.
More than half of respondents have already integrated, or are actively integrating, their provider data with systems like EMRs, lab platforms, and billing applications. By contrast, fewer than half( 47 %) have tackled data management for referring providers. Roughly one‐third( 32 %) have established – or are establishing – new data‐focused roles within their organizations, and 30 % are connecting provider data management to physician scheduling solutions.
Please rate the progress your organization has made in each provider data management initiative.( n = 262)
50
51 %
40
34 %
39 %
41 %
30
27 %
24 %
28 %
30 %
26 %
20
10
0
19 %
2 % 2 %
Implementing a single, master provider database for your enterprise that is the single source of truth for provider data
7 % 7 %
Integrating your provider data with downstream applications including EMR, laboratory, pharmacy, billing, payer and marketing databases
17 %
10 %
17 %
Managing, updating, and validating data on referring providers
18 % 15 %
16 %
12 %
Creating new data roles within your organization, including Directors of Provider Analytics, Database Administrators, Data Scientists, or others
11 %
18 %
11 %
18 %
Integration with physician scheduling solutions( such as provider scheduling, on-call scheduling, etc.)
Implemented
In Implementation
Not Implemented
Don’ t Know
Not Applicable
2025 TRENDS IN MEDICAL STAFF CREDENTIALING- PROCESS IMPROVEMENT: WHAT DRIVES MEANINGFUL CHANGE? 16