新パラダイムのグリーンエネルギー技術が影響する社会, 経済及び地政状況 / Green Energy's New Paradigm.. 新パラダイムの常温核融合などの技術が影響する社会, 経済及び地政状況 / New Energy.. | Page 4
• This presenta , on primarily focuses on less known but latest science consensus forming technologies on strict effect basis , while a bulk of highest efficiency low cost techs & a majority of " outrageous " or controversial claims category contradict predominant view , especially of Wikipedia & Western media / NGOs . Hence aGendants / readers are recommended to re-assess the data individually .
• Regarding Controversial But Future Cri , cal Technologies Discussed :
■ Term “ Free energy ” or “ Over-unity ” in this presenta , on is defined as seeming as if : -1 Drawing more energy than exis , ng or con , nuous mo , on with no energy input . -2 “ Work is done ” by other than Thermodynamic Free Energy : open system symptom . -3 Using free material generally not considered as fuel .
■ Inventors-scien , sts-witnesses : their claims might involve higher likelihood of : -4 Fabrica , on , reliability exaggera , on , or sta , s , cal error chance of observed effect . -5 Significant quality gap between inven , ons , yet - -6 At least collec , ve majority seems to consistently produces claimed effects .
• Currently more detailed reference list is being produced & will be published separately :
Most effects quoted have accumula , ve-consistent evidence from unrelated era & source , but mechanics & categoriza , on are hypothe , cal . Commercialized company / products are shown in Boldface Dark Blue . Due to space constraints , referenced individuals names are given only last name or part of first name unless web search iden : fica : on becomes difficult ( o = en non-Western names are given in full ), & company names are listed in a way that is findable by internet search .
Qualification of information
• This presenta , on primarily focuses on less known but latest science consensus forming technologies on strict effect basis , while a bulk of highest efficiency low cost techs & a majority of " outrageous " or controversial claims category contradict predominant view , especially of Wikipedia & Western media / NGOs . Hence aGendants / readers are recommended to re-assess the data individually .
• Regarding Controversial But Future Cri , cal Technologies Discussed :
■ Term “ Free energy ” or “ Over-unity ” in this presenta , on is defined as seeming as if : -1 Drawing more energy than exis , ng or con , nuous mo , on with no energy input . -2 “ Work is done ” by other than Thermodynamic Free Energy : open system symptom . -3 Using free material generally not considered as fuel .
■ Inventors-scien , sts-witnesses : their claims might involve higher likelihood of : -4 Fabrica , on , reliability exaggera , on , or sta , s , cal error chance of observed effect . -5 Significant quality gap between inven , ons , yet - -6 At least collec , ve majority seems to consistently produces claimed effects .
• Currently more detailed reference list is being produced & will be published separately :
Most effects quoted have accumula , ve-consistent evidence from unrelated era & source , but mechanics & categoriza , on are hypothe , cal . Commercialized company / products are shown in Boldface Dark Blue . Due to space constraints , referenced individuals names are given only last name or part of first name unless web search iden : fica : on becomes difficult ( o = en non-Western names are given in full ), & company names are listed in a way that is findable by internet search .