Современные проблемы сервиса и туризма 2016_v.10_#3 | Page 13
Стр. 7–17
Афанасьев Олег Евгеньевич
6. Курьянова Т.С. Музей и нематериальное культурное наследие // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. 2012.
№ 361 С. 55–57.
7. Саранча М.А., Якимова С.Л. Центры традиционных народных художественных промыслов как
основа развития туристской маршрутной сети в Москве и Московской области // Современные
проблемы сервиса и туризма. 2015. Т. 9. № 4. С. 44–50. DOI: 10.12737/14531.
8. Труевцева О.Н. Нематериальное культурное наследие и краеведческий музей // Вестник Алтайского государственного педагогического университета. 2016. № 26. С. 36–40.
9. Яковенко Н.В. Народные художественные промыслы как особый бренд культурного туризма
депрессивного региона (на примере Ивановской области) // Современные проблемы сервиса
и туризма. 2015. Т. 9. № 4. С. 62–71. DOI: 10.12737/14533.
10. Georgiev G., Terziyska I. Мasterpieces of intangible heritage in the countries of Southeast Europe
and tourism development // MakeLearn 2013: Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management &
Innovation. Zadar: University of Zadar, 2013. Pp. 1279–1285.
11. Gonzalez M.V. Intangible heritage tourism and identity // Tourism Management. 2008. Vol. 29. Pp.
807–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.003.
12. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett B. Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production // Museum International.
2004. Vol. 56. № 1–2. Рp. 52–64.
13. Schuster M.J. Making a List and Checking it Twice: The List as a Tool of Historic Preservation // CPC
[Cultural Policy Centre at the University of Chicago] Working Paper. 2002. Vol. 14. 21 p.
Oleg E. Afanasiev
Russian State University of Tourism and Service (Moscow, Russia);
PhD (Dr.Sc.) in Geography, Professor; e-mail: [email protected]
MASTERPIECES OF THE ORAL AND INTANGIBLE HERITAGE
OF HUMANITY: THE ROLE AND FUNCTION IN TOURISM
Currently, participation of objects of a particular country in different global rankings and in the attractions lists is a symbol of prestige and importance for state. But such lists play important role in the forming tourist flows. List of Masterpieces of the World Oral and Intangible Cultural Heritage is among them. It is drawn up under the auspices of UNESCO.
The Russian Federation is not a participant of the relevant protection convention of this type of heritage. That is why
its representation in the List is very low and does not correspond to the role and significance of the country’s culture
in the global dimension. But even only two objects from the Intangible Heritage List, which are located in Russia, have
significant potential for the forming tourist flows and tourist complexes development on their basis. It is proved by the
experience of the involving these objects in tourism.
The article describes three formats of transformation the intangible cultural heritage of the Russian Federation in the
tour product: 1) a museum establishment; 2) a theme park; 3) the places of heritage existence in the real environment.
Three forms of the intangible heritage presentation in the tourism industry are also highlighted. They suggest the possibility of visiting and acquaintance of tourists with the environment of existence, intangible heritage landscape, a certain
type of culture in which it develops, and familiarity with the famous person – bearer and guardian of tradition.
The article also identifies a number of threats for these objects themselves, which may be accompanied by involving
of the intangible heritage in the tourism and hospitality industry. As the conclusions, the article proposes a number of
urgent measures that are important to ensure the sustainability of tourism development based on places of existence of
the intangible cultural heritage in Russia.
Keywords: masterpieces of the intangible cultural heritage, role of the intangible heritage in tourism, UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage, place of existence of the intangible heritage objects.
References:
1. Afanasiev O.E., Volkhina V.V. The role, significance and functions of skansen as a tourism resource of territory and
representants of national traditions of nature-use. Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism:
Current Challenges], 2015, vol.10, No.3, pp. 12–22. DOI: 10.12737/14527.
2. Afanasiev O.E., Patsyuk V.S. Industrial sites in the UNESCO World Heritage list. Industrial’nyj turizm: realii i perspektivy [Industrial tourism: Realities and Prospects]: Proceedings of the First International Scientific-Practical Forum.
Krivoy Rog: Institute of the city of Krivoy Rog, 2013, pp. 68–77.
3. Glushkova P.V. Classification of open-air museums in terms of updating the intangible cultural heritage. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Kemerovo State University], 2015, vol.1, No.1 (61), pp. 59–63.
4. Demina S.A., Valeev R.M. Interaction of the Russian Federation with UNESCO as one of the foreign policy priorities in the sphere of international cultural and humanitarian coo peration. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of Kazan State University of Culture and Arts], 2015, No.1, pp. 110–113.
16