БҚМУ жаршысы - Вестник ЗКГУ ЗКГУ. Вестник, 1-2019 | Page 365

БҚМУ Хабаршы №1-2019ж. were more abundant in the ecotone zone, which was explained with the change of the conditions in crops as a result of agrotechnical treatments intensity during the year. Conclusions. Mite biodiversity is dependent on various habitat parameters that are changeable through space and time. Once the species appear as a result of speciation it disperse and establish populations with parameters that result from specific abiotic and biotic conditions in the place of colonization. Even in the local stable community the biodiversity changes due to such ecological processes as succession and short-time seasonal fluctuations of its shaping factors. Apart from studying the mite communities just to assess the current local biodiversity we can use it in the future to monitor the level and direction of biodiversity changes to evaluate reasons and possible effects on the various spatial scale. Most of niches occupied by the free-living mites are somehow related to the soil systems from which they spread during evolution to other i.e. plant, animal, aquatic and marine habitats [7]. This radiation of edaphic mites (called by Krantz and Walter 2009 “evolutionary revolution”) is reflected in present biodiversity of this group and the importance of the soil mites understood as regulation of the matter and energy flow within natural systems is the main ecosystem service offered by this systematic group, irrespective of the specific niche of e.g. species or genus within the food-web. List of Mesostigmata (=Gamasida, Acari: Parasitiformes) included in this article Suborder: Monogynaspida Cohort: Uropodina Subcohort: Uropodiae Family: Dinychidae Dinychus perforatus Kramer, 1886 Family: Discourellidae Discourella modesta (Leonardi, 1899) Family: Polyaspididae Polyaspis patavinus Berlese, 1881 Family: Trachytidae Trachytes aegrota (C.L. Koch, 1841) Trachytes Montana Willmann, 1953 Family: Trematuridae Trichouropoda ovalis (C.L. Koch, 1839) Family: Urodinychidae Urodiaspis tecta (Kramer, 1876) Uroobovella minima (C.L. Koch, 1841) Family: Uropodidae Uropoda minima Kramer, 1882 Uropodamisella (Berlese, 1916) Cohort : Gamasina Subcohort: Epicriiae Family: Zerconidae Echinozercon americanus Błaszak, 1982 Parazercon radiatus (Berlese, 1914) Prozerconkochi Sellnick, 1943 Zercon fageticola Halaškova, 1969 Zercon peltatus C.L. Koch, 1836 Zercon triangularis C.L. Koch, 1836 Zercon zelawaiensis Sellnick, 1944 Subcohort: Parasitiae Family: Parasitidae Holoparasitus calcaratus (C.L. Koch, 1839) 364