MAIN STRENGTHS AND KEY CHALLENGES
Multisectoral partnerships The programme promotes partnership between public and private actors and effectively combines community resources with private and public funding. The contribution of private sector partners is not limited to funding and includes internships, vocational training and information sessions.
Coordinated approach The mentoring programme is implemented in close cooperation with social services based on a partnership agreement with the Angered district. The programme was carefully designed to complement rather than replace the existing state services. Mentors work closely with social services and guardians within the framework of children’ s individual action plans.
Support for children in their transition to adulthood All those on the programme receive support up to the age of 23, which is particularly important given that the majority of unaccompanied and separated children arriving in Europe are between 16 and 17. As many of them turn 18 before their asylum and migration procedures are concluded, they have to leave state care and do not receive the same support anymore from the state.
Consultation with children In its design, the programme is based on a study examining the situation faced by unaccompanied and separated children in Sweden. The study draws on interviews with children as well as experts, authorities, staff at shelters and other professionals. A group of children also directly participate in designing the programme, and feedback from participants provides a foundation for adjusting the programme to accommodate children’ s needs.
Ability to reach only children with residence status The practice aims to support the integration of children into Swedish society, which requires individual planning, personal involvement and a high level of commitment on the part of children. The experience of the implementing partners shows that children who do not have a secure residence status often do not have this level of commitment in developing a plan for their future in Sweden, as they fear that their asylum applications will be rejected and they will be forced to leave the country. This uncertainty makes it challenging for service providers to plan for the long term. The programme faced difficulties in adjusting its services to the needs of these children and as a result it currently only works with children with residence status.
118