Zoom-in Winter 2016 Zoom-in Winter 2016 | Page 9

Ofcom decided that Ms G’s son was not identifiable to anyone save for those few who knew him. It was not clear to Ofcom that it was the footage, rather than comments on social media, that led to the identification of Ms G’s son and him being attacked, taunted at school and labelled a gang member. Accordingly, the broadcast was not unfair to him, as those who were able to identify him would already know about the circumstances surrounding the incident and his presence at it. Ofcom also found no unwarranted infringement of privacy. Ofcom noted that being in a public place and being involved in or a witness to a crime does not automatically deprive an individual of a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the circumstances could reasonably be considered a sensitive situation. It was additionally noted that special care must be taken in relation to the privacy of those aged under 16. Nonetheless, Ofcom found Ms G’s son had no reasonable expectation of privacy. It was material that the footage was obtained by Channel 4 News to highlight the increased use of knives by London gangs, rather than to focus on any individual. In particular, as Ms G’s son was not readily identifiable to an ordinary viewer, he did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the obtaining of the footage, nor in relation to its broadcast. This is an interesting case as, in spite of Ms G’s son being under 16, and there apparently having been consequences for him as a result of being identified, no breach was found. Channel 4 News was able to demonstrate the lengths it had gone to in order to ensure the footage was obtained properly and that blurring technique s were used where necessary. Programme-makers should always seek advice from an experienced lawyer on these matters to ensure they do not fall foul of the numerous laws at play in this area, which include contempt, reporting restrictions, privacy and data protection law. OFCOM – HARM AND OFFENCE: Harry Hill’s TV Burp – repeat in breach n Ofcom has found an episode of Harry Hill’s TV Burp, aired on the channel Dave, to be in breach of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code’s rules on harm and offence. The episode had previously transmitted on ITV in 2008 and although complaints were made then, they were not upheld. The show referred to a documentary entitled The Pregnant Man on Channel 4 about Thomas Beatie, a transgender male able to conceive and carry a baby because he had retained his female reproductive organs. The item intercut clips of the documentary with narration from Harry Hill. The content became increasingly surreal, culminating in Harry Hill wearing an oxygen mask and giving birth to a doll which was told to call him ‘mummy’ instead of ‘dada’. The complainant, a member of the public, considered that the item was offensive and discriminatory towards the transgender c o m m u n i t y. Ofcom considered the material under Rule 2.3 of the Broadcasting Code, which requires broadcasters to ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the context. In its defence, the broadcaster argued that the segment mocked the sensationalist title The Pregnant Man, as opposed to Mr Beatie himself. It also pointed out that they had removed one minute of potentially offensive material from the original cut of the programme before broadcast, which in their view did stray towards mocking Mr Beatie. It also argued that the audience would understand GAVE BIRTH TO A DOLL: HARRY HILL the surreal nature of Harry Hill’s material, and that while his comments were absurd and juvenile, they were not intended to cause offence or be discriminatory. However, in response to the complaint, the broadcaster accepted that attitudes had changed since 2008, when the show originally aired, and said that they had already removed the item from future broadcasts of the programme. Ofcom disagreed with the broadcaster, finding that the item had directly mocked Mr Beatie. Ofcom stated that although there is significant room for innovation, creativity and challenging material, broadcasters do not have an unlimited licence to be offensive. Ofcom also noted that the transgender community has ‘protected characteristics’ under equality law and highlighted references in the programme such as ‘Victorian freak show’ and ‘Oh I see – it’s a woman with a beard’ as likely to be highly offensive to the transgender The content became increasingly surreal, culminating in Hill wearing an oxygen mask and giving birth to a doll zoom-in Winter 2016 | 9