REGULATION – OFCOM , ASA & IPSO
REGULATION – OFCOM , ASA & IPSO
permission . The Daily Star stated that the website was not private and was accessible with a name and email address – there was no need to pay a fee . It also said that its journalist may not have seen Ms Pearce ’ s full profile ( and so the disclaimer ) because he had only taken the information that was publicly available .
IPSO found that the information on Ms Pearce ’ s profile was of a nature which most would consider highly private , but as she had disclosed it on a public website she had no reasonable expectation of privacy . The Daily Star article had not given her name or given any further information about her beyond her profile photograph and username .
IPSO therefore found no breach of the Code . It did , however , welcome the fact that after receiving Ms Pearce ’ s complaint , the Daily Star had removed the screenshot of her profile from the article . This is a useful decision for content producers , affirming that even inherently private information about an individual will not attract a reasonable expectation of privacy where the individual has placed , or consented to the placement of , that information on a website easily accessible to members of the public .
OFCOM – report on offensive language on television
n Ofcom has released a report on public attitudes to offensive language entitled Attitudes to potentially offensive language and gestures on TV and radio . The report includes a ranking of swearwords , from milder words which people generally have little concern about , to the strongest words , which are highly unacceptable before the 9pm watershed , but generally acceptable post-watershed , if justified by the context .
Unsurprisingly the strongest words were ‘ cunt ’, ‘ motherfucker ’ and ‘ fuck ’. Lower down the scale , however , there were some surprises : ‘ tits ’ was considered more offensive than ‘ bugger ’, and ‘ bastard ’ more offensive than ‘ arsehole ’.
Those involved in the study thought the 9pm watershed to be
Word |
Acceptability |
Arse |
Mild language , generally of little concern . |
Arsehole |
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact . |
Balls |
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . Particularly vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact , especially for women . |
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . More aggression or |
Bastard |
specific intent to hurt heightens impact . Less problematic when used to refer |
indirectly to someone who is cruel or nasty . |
Beaver |
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as vulgar and distasteful , especially by women . |
Beef curtains
Bellend
Bint
Bitch
Bloodclaat
Bloody
Bollocks
Bugger
Bullshit
Clunge
Cock
Cow
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Low recognition . Seen as vulgar and distasteful , especially by women .
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen by some as a childish word often said in jest . More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact .
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as potentially derogatory by women , but men also find the word problematic .
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact .
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Low recognition . Among those familiar , seen as vulgar and crude . Strongly disliked by women when meaning discussed .
Mild language , generally of little concern . Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion , and not usually as a directed insult .
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . Not generally offensive but somewhat vulgar when used to refer to testicles . Less problematic when used to mean ‘ nonsense ’.
Mild language , generally of little concern . Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion when making a mistake . Seen as much stronger when used in a clearly sexual context .
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable .
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Not always recognised . Seen as vulgar and distasteful , especially by women .
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many . Less problematic when used in a humorous context .
Mild language , generally of little concern . Commonly viewed as a humorous insult .
Crap Mild language , generally of little concern . Strongest language , problematic for some even post-watershed . Vulgar ,
Cunt derogatory and shocking for both men and women . Especially distasteful and offensive to women and older participants .
Damn Mild language , generally of little concern . Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as vulgar and
Dick distasteful by many . Less problematic when used in a humorous context , and generally considered slightly milder than ‘ cock ’.
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as vulgar and
Dickhead distasteful by many . Less problematic when used in a humorous context . Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as crude ,
Fanny particularly by women .
Feck / Effing
Flaps very important in protecting children , and also for adults who wanted to avoid strong language . Swear words were generally considered more acceptable if used in a context in which they would be used in everyday , ‘ real world ’ speech .
Medium language , potentially unacceptable pre-watershed . Often seen as humorous . Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable .
Strong language , generally unacceptable pre-watershed . Seen as crude and often derogatory , particularly by women .
12 | zoom-in Winter 2016