World Monitor Magazine, #5, Industry World Monitor Magazine, Industrial Overview | Page 77

K16: ‘Afterword’?! Later, after the international forum K16: Kazakhstan Growth Forum, inspirer, organiser, and head of the group of companies, Centras Eldar Abdrazakov, shared his views on the most important topics disclosed at the forum. Takeaway #1: ‘Alien’ globalisation The world we knew is no longer such, says Harvard professor Raui Abdelal. Post-war development of the world economy has passed under the march of American hegemony. Basic institutions of globalisation – the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, United Nations – were founded and are still located in the United States. Anglo-Saxon principles of free trade and capital flows have become educational truths. World business speak is ‘Americano’. Fixated on oil prices, we do not notice how fast the world is changing. Developed countries have focused on developing high- 74 world monitor tech industries. Major developing countries – BRIC – focus on mass production and globalisation within an aggressive regional expansion. Each promotes their own interests. Americans and Europeans are more interested in local issues, and they are willing to sacrifice the global issues. The British majority, who voted for Brexit, rejects globalisation and immigration. Questions of local employment, social inequality, and cultural differences come to the fore in elected Western democracies. National interests and protectionism is back in vogue. Politicians cannot ignore it. The voltage will increase. What are these new institutions of Bretton Woods 2.0 and the World Trade Organization? Takeaway #2: Strategic advantage 4.0 According to Mikhail Romanov, EY Partner, the new industrial revolution will drastically change the social and economic reality. For more information, please, read Mr Romanov’s article ‘Industry 4.0 – the new world’ in this issue of the magazine. Takeaway #3: Lonely at the Top At K16, we first tried to make sense of the Kazakh model of governance. For us it is important to understand that it is not technology and strategy that will make Kazakhstan