World Food Policy Volume/Issue 2-2/3-1 Fall 2015/Spring 2016 | Page 167

World Food Policy agricultural research and development was inefficient. Weak market institutions, ineffective crop storage facilities, high percentage of food loss, fragile logistics services and distribution channels, fragile input and output market access, lack of adequate credit system to small farmers, lack of training, and use of news cultural methods and technologies are frequent failures of agricultural policies. Agricultural and food security policies are extremely weak and not consistent in the long term. The situation results from inefficient and fragile institutions, weakened government, and public institutions effectiveness, sometimes political instability, corruption, or conflicts. Potential for Greater Productivity: A Critical Issue Intensification of agricultural production is essential in the more densely populated areas in order to feed the rapidly growing and urbanizing population in SSA. To remediate the current situation, an “African Green Revolution” is sometimes proposed (Otsuka and Larson 2012). But sustainable intensification of small farming systems is probably the most accurate element of agricultural policy in SSA. This process is generally based on three basic elements: (1) production of more food, feed, fuel, and/or fiber per unit of land, labor, and/or capital used; (2) preservation of ecosystem services, including those governed by healthy soils; and (3) resilience to shocks and stresses, including climate change (Pretty 2014). Sustainable intensification of small farming systems recognizes that enhanced productivity needs to be consistent with the maintenance of other ecosystem services and enhanced resilience to shocks. Increasing productivity in a sustainable way for small farming systems in SSA will require new technologies that are appropriate and adaptable for African smallholder farmers and pastoralists and suitable for local agro-environmental conditions at different scales (region, village, and farm). The heterogeneity of smallholder farming systems suggests that processes for sustainable intensification will need to be flexible and adapted to local agro-ecological and socioeconomic conditions. Wealthier farmers can move into the process with investments into knowledge acquisition (Pretty 2011). For poorer households, more incentive structures would be required, provided that such household can move out of the poverty trap. In any case, enhanced productivity requires access to agro-inputs, profitable output markets, and access to credit, rural infrastructure, marketing, processing and storage organization, reduction of post-harvest losses, and proper access to agricultural knowledge, services, and information. Government investments and policy frameworks will be crucial, including facilitating private sector engagement. In this case, policy regulations, incentives, and coherent intervention strategies across national, regional, community, and farm scales appear essential. Doubling agricultural output to meet demand and alleviate hunger will increase pressure on already-stressed resources, requiring greater efficiency in agriculture and food systems. Sustainable 167