World Food Policy Volume 3, No. 2/Volume 4, No. 1, Fall16/Spring17 | Page 130

World Food Policy second section looks at the challenges involved in measuring resilience. The third section establishes a link with the sustainability approaches. The fourth and final section outlines what could be a “pro-resilience” policy in the Sahel. also form part of the “early recovery” approach promoted by UNDP in the early 2000s, and conceived as a transi- tional stage between the abnormality of a crisis and the normality of devel- opment; or part of the FAO’s twin track approach to improve the consistency between emergency food aid and struc- Resilience: A Useful Notion? tural reduction of food insecurity. We What is New? might also mention here the long-es- tablished integrated rural development he first question we should ask approaches aimed at globally address- ourselves is: what is new about ing the development of rural territories resilience? Not much, in actual and more effectively coordinating vari- fact. First, despite an old reputation for ous aid modalities. resignation and passivity, West African peasants and shepherds did not wait for the fashion of resilience to respond A New Neoliberal Avatar? and adapt to risks. Michael Mortimore, he resilience approach therefore writing in 1989, described the nature often tends to create something of Sahelian livelihoods as “uncertain- new out of something old. This ty-as-norm” and therefore designed is not problematic in itself, since it can to adapt to uncertainty. The keywords provide an insight into Sahelian crises found in the extensive literature on this and allow aid to be precisely targeted. subject, across various disciplines, are However, for some authors, resilience flexibility, diversification, complexi- also poses a real threat. For a start, since ty, mobility, and adaptation. This long it is conservative by nature, it could be tradition also explains why so many dangerous. It is rooted in ecosystemic researchers are irritated by the emer- approaches, which focus on the mainte- gence of a notion that is supposed to nance of the system’s essential functions fill an analytical void, whereas a lot has and on an adaptive cycle, in order to already been written on the practices of ensure a return to equilibrium. As a re- Sahelians, of which practitioners and, sult, there would be no crises, just nec- particularly, funding bodies are too of- essary and spontaneous adjustments. ten unaware. The highly conservative potential of the T T Secondly, the drive for integra- tion is nothing new. Attempts have been made to go beyond the usual emergen- cy/development divide since the 1990s with the LRRD (Linking Relief, Reha- bilitation, and Development) approach, a favorite of the European Union. They duplication on social area is clear, as is the resulting risk of an inability to ad- dress development issues, which would be seen as a disruption. Analysts of so- cioecological systems have, neverthe- less, attempted to avoid this stumbling block by broadening their thinking 130