World Food Policy Volume 3, No. 2/Volume 4, No. 1, Fall16/Spring17 | Page 117

One Size Fits all or Tailor-Made? Building Appropriate Certification Systems for Geographical Indications in Southeast Asia Figure 3: GI control system in Vietnam Source: Authors’ survey. charge of accrediting agencies for Vi- etGap for crops, while the Department of Livestock is in charge of accrediting agencies for VietGap for livestock. No certification bodies inspect GIs, although there are many private Vietnamese certification bodies accred- ited by foreign accreditation organiza- tions, such as Vinacert, which certifies mangoes from Hoa Loc, tea from Van Chan, and tea from Yen Bai against Vi- etGAP. In the absence of Vietnamese organic agriculture standards, foreign certification bodies—e.g., Organic Ag- riculture Thailand (ACT) in Thailand— certify that Vietnamese products com- ply with foreign organic agriculture standards. This is the case of organic tea from Yen Bai, or organic star anise from Lang Son, two GI products. The GI control system devel- oped by Cambodia is very similar to the French system. It is detailed and includes an internal control by the GI association, and is funded by a fee paid by all members (producers, processors, packagers) of the GI association, an ex- ternal control by a private or public ISO 17  065-accredited certification body, chosen by the GI association and ap- proved by the Ministry of Commerce, the authority responsible for official controls. 26 The certification body au- dits the internal control system and inspects a subsample of GI association members. As Cambodia does not yet have an accreditation system for GI or Cambodian certification bodies that would be internationally recognized, the two Cambodian GIs are controlled and certified by foreign certification bodies accredited in the EU. Indeed, the only certification body in the country is the Cambodian Organic Agriculture Association (COrAA), a small private organization in the sector promoting organic agriculture in Cambodia that is not recognized internationally but conducts a few inspections each year for foreign certification bodies willing to certify foreign standards (e.g., GAP, 26 Art.26 and 27 of the GI Law 2014 and art.37 to 41 of the Prakas of 2016. 117