wolfy. Issue Two | Page 17

Carrie (2013) Different aspects of this 2013 version of “Carrie” make it more of a modern horror-which is essentially more horrifying. Unlike the 1976 version makes me feel slightly more on edge. I think this is due to several things: one; the beginning scene is creepy, and immediately makes you wonder what is making that woman scream so horribly in that foreboding house. Secondly; there is more blood, and it is definitely more graphic than its predecessor, which is more true to the novel. Thirdly; Ms White’s nuttiness is taken to a whole new level with the depth of her character. The moments where she hurt herself really got to me - even more so than the actual violence of prom night. And lastly; the special effects were well done, and the deaths of certain people are much more satisfying than that depicted in the original. This interpretation has got its own individuality from both the book and 1976’s “Carrie”, which adds a fresh spin. I liked how Carrie’s character is shown in more depth, so that the audience gets a better understanding of her and her life. The acting isn’t quite up to the standard of 1976, but Chloë Grace Moretz is a great actress, and the spunkiness of her own personality showed through, which was good to see. The cruelty of Carrie’s peers could have been amplified slightly, but it was over all very well done. Verdict: With all this put into account, I personally prefer the more recent, 2013 version “Carrie”. But go ahead and watch them and decide yourself! Both are great films in their own right and both are definitely worth watching “if you’ve got a taste for terror.”