WINDOWS Magazine Winter 2013 | Page 25

So why the constrained short term outlook which is reflected in a national forecast for a flat year for housing starts in 2013? There are three key aspects to the historically low national level of housing starts evident in 2011, 2012 and that is forecast to persist in 2013. Firstly, there is less demand for new housing due to the cautious mindset of households and household finances provide a good demonstration of this. There are fewer new housing loans being written and of those being written, the average loan size has been declining (in real terms), while on the other side of the equation households with mortgages are focusing on paying down mortgage debt. Secondly, there is the credit crunch, which reflects the considerably lower appetite Australia’s banks have for lending to housing. This credit crunch comes in two parts: • There are a significant number of new home building clients who gain pre-finance approval but then fail to obtain final loan approval from their bank and are therefore unable to proceed to build a home. Demand for new housing is therefore not as weak as an aggregate analysis would suggest – lack of available finance is preventing the realisation of some potential demand. • Credit conditions applying to residential developments are very tight and have indeed got tighter over the last 12 months. Many commercially viable projects are either not receiving finance or are being rendered unviable by untenable lending criteria which are inconsistent with the structure of the business realities of residential construction. Thirdly, the cost base (i.e. taxation and regulation) of the new home building sector is disproportionately high as well as being widely inefficient and inequitable. With the exception of some modest state initiatives there are no longer short term stimulus measures in place to assist in overcoming this high cost base. More significantly, the appetite for policy reform to reduce the high cost base is low to non-existent across Australian Governments. Furthermore, the problematic tax bias against new housing has been exacerbated in recent years due to easing existing property prices. In other words for many buyers the sums don’t add up when comparing new housing to existing property. New housing is a sector of the Australian economy in dire need of considerable reform, as clearly evidenced by the results from the three reports the HIA has commissioned from the Centre for International Economics regarding the taxation of housing and the importance of housing to the wider economy. Economic reform, be it micro or macro in nature, generally requires bold and decisive policy strategy, development and action. Consequently such reform is inevitably controversial and usually a ‘hard sell’ for Governments in the early stages of proposed and actual change. Contemporary Australian politicians by and large lack the appetite for such decisive policy plans and actions. Let’s hope that changes soon. 22 www.awa.org.au Winter 2013