White Papers What Does Tomorrows CTRM Look Like? | Page 4
Commodity
Management
A
ComTech
Advisory
Whitepaper
address
operational
risks,
effectively
manage
and
optimize
supply
chains,
ensure
compliance
with
regulations
and
provide
trading
intelligence.
The
tremendous
drivers
for
change
that
we
see
impacting
commodity
markets
mean
that
all
companies
must
take
immediate
action
to
improve
their:
•
•
•
Market
transparency
–
a
need
to
develop
market
awareness
driven
by
data
and
maintain
a
vigilant
eye
on
macro
trends.
Strategies
must
be
formulated
around
those
macro
trends
and
managed
on
market
data
and
real-‐time
(or
near
real-‐time)
analysis
of
that
data
in
multiple
formats
and
from
many
sources,
including
quite
possibly
even
various
forms
of
social
media.
Internal
transparency
–
profit
is
made
or
lost
on
daily
decisions.
Accurate
and
timely
position
management,
risk
management
and
business
intelligence
support
are
key
to
ensure
opportunities
are
exploited,
costs
kept
under
control
and
risks
addressed.
Regulatory
transparency
–
regulators
will
be
quick
to
move
and
once
on
their
radar,
businesses
will
be
the
target
of
scrutiny
for
a
very
long
time.
Developing
a
culture
of
compliance
and
improving
transparency
for
regulators
is
crucial
to
avoiding
punitive
and
damaging
enforcement
actions.
The
chances
of
succeeding
in
the
broader
commodity
industries
in
the
future
are
increasingly
dependent
on
the
trading,
trade
management
and
supply
chain
management
technologies
deployed
and
utilized
to
address
these
big
challenges,
including
CTRM,
data
aggregation
and
analysis,
trading
surveillance,
business
intelligence
and
reporting.
Much
like
the
traders
who
earn
their
living
in
these
unsettled
markets,
the
technologists
that
produce
CTRM
software
are
also
being
challenged
like
never
before.
Delivering
Flexibility
and
Agility
in
CTRM
The
common
factor
to
being
successful
in
meeting
these
challenges
is
to
deliver
CTRM
software
that
not
only
has
the
required
functionality
but
that
is
also
both
flexible
and
agile.
However,
when
it
comes
to
software
of
any
kind,
these
terms
are
overused
and
therefore
somewhat
meaningless.
Providing
agility
and
flexibility
is,
in
part,
about
the
technology
and
architecture
chosen
to
deliver
the
functionality.
Today,
those
applications
best
able
to
deliver
these
attributes
are
generally
highly
modular,
web-‐enabled
applications
that
make
use
of
service
oriented
architectures.
Consideration
must
also
be
given
to
the
user
interface
to
ensure
that
it
is
not
merely
configurable,
but
that
it
can
truly
be
personalized
by
each
end
user
without
the
need
for
programmer
involvement.
It
must
also
be
graphical,
intuitive
and
engaging
to
the
user.
Finally,
the
application
must
be
able
to
deal
with
data
in
multiple
formats
and
to
help
the
user
extract
the
maximum
value
from
that
information.
However,
even
when
all
of
the
above
is
true,
it
might
all
be
for
naught
if
the
software
vendor
takes
the
traditional
approach
to
delivering
software.
In
the
traditional
software
delivery
mechanism,
a
vendor
releases
upgrades
to
the
software
periodically.
In
the
fast-‐moving
world
of
CTRM,
there
might
be
4
to
6
incremental
releases
per
year.
Each
incremental
release
needs
to
be
tested
and
then
implemented
by
the
user
and,
after
a
while,
the
users
inevitably
fall
behind
on
the
release
cycle.
In
extreme
cases,
the
end
users
fall
so
far
behind
that
they
lose
their
support
(most
vendors
will
only
support
a
fixed
number
of
previous
versions
of
their
software).
Given
that
fact
and
the
unavoidable
conflict
between
the
vendor’s
prioritizing
of
certain
new
functionality
to
drive
sales
rather
than
meet
the
specific
needs
of
individual
customers,
the
inevitable
happens:
Users
are
forced
to
create
spreadsheet
workarounds
to
give
themselves
much-‐needed
new
functionality.
Suddenly,
the
use
of
spreadsheets
outside
of
the
system
–
the
very
problem
that
the
new
CTRM
solution
was
designed
to
fix
in
the
first
place
–
begins
to
flourish
once
again.
Surprisingly
perhaps,
another
issue
is
the
commercial
structure
of
the
software
licensing
deal.
Most
software
has
historically
been
licensed
on
a
one-‐off
basis
and
the
users
then
pay
a
percentage
of
that
initial
license
fee
for
annual
support
and
maintenance.
Add
more
users
and
perhaps
you
will
pay
an
incremental
license
fee.
Ask
for
©
Commodity
Technology
Advisory
LLC,
2014
4