This doesn’ t mean that our situation has improved or that our cost of living has become reassuring. It only means that the territory’ s tariff autonomy insulates Guam from the impact of the tit-for-tat levies that ensued from Trump’ s cavalier policy.
FROM THE PUBLISHER’ S DESK
What we can do
National economists are predicting an economic meltdown resulting from Donald Trump’ s whimsical tariff regime, which stirs up trade wars. Amid the global mayhem, local economist Gary Hiles pointed out that Guam is— oddly but agreeably— in a bright spot.
The tariff hullabaloo presented a serendipitous occasion when we are consoled by the isolated perks of Guam’ s status as an unincorporated territory( which is generally not ideal).
“ Guam is outside of the U. S. Customs system and the U. S. tariffs do not apply to imports to Guam,” he said.
This doesn’ t mean that our situation has improved or that our cost of living has become reassuring. It only means that the territory’ s tariff autonomy insulates Guam from the impact of the tit-for-tat levies that ensued from Trump’ s cavalier policy. We are still subject to ridiculously high prices of goods that come into Guam— courtesy of Jones Act— but Hiles said they would have spiraled further if Guam were under federal Customs jurisdiction. In other words, our situation may not be better, but it didn’ t get worse.
Guam sets its own tariff, which means the territory has the ability to schedule a made-to-measure rate that the local market can absorb.
However, Guam is not completely immune to the indirect repercussions of the reciprocal tariffs given Guam’ s dependence on imports. As reported by Phillip V. Cruz Jr.( see story on page 11),“ Several items sold on Guam come
4
This doesn’ t mean that our situation has improved or that our cost of living has become reassuring. It only means that the territory’ s tariff autonomy insulates Guam from the impact of the tit-for-tat levies that ensued from Trump’ s cavalier policy.
from countries affected by the tariffs. They first go through U. S. suppliers who get taxed. Those extra costs end up being added to the final price when the goods reach Guam.”
At any rate, Hiles said this knot is easy to untangle.“ This could open up a chance for businesses to skip those extra costs by importing directly from the original country to Guam. As a result, companies might rethink their shipping routes to save money.”
Another trump card— pun unintended— Guam can play is the General Headnote 3( a)( iv) of the U. S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule, which allows“ products manufactured on Guam to be treated as made in the U. S. and not subject to import taxes, provided that sufficient value-added is gained in Guam manufacturing.”
Guam, of course, does not have a manufacturing industry to speak of. But every grand venture sprouts from a tiny seed of idea. Sen. William Parkinson’ s Bill 102-38, titled the Guam Tariff Advantage Development Act, would create tariff advantage zones around the island to attract manufacturing enterprises and foster economic diversification. Under the bill,“ manufacturers would set up shop in Guam, import the materials needed to create their products, and then transform raw materials into finished products for eventual sale to the U. S. mainland, allowing them to bypass the tariffs.”
It sounds promising and concerning at the same time. The Northern Marianas had successfully done this. The commonwealth enjoyed its glory years in the 1980s and 1990s at the height of the billion-dollar garment industry. Sewn garments were shipped from Asian countries, assembled and packaged in Saipan factories, where they were labeled“ Made in USA.”
Ironically, the sources of its success— immigration and wage autonomy combined with legal loopholes easy to abuse— were the cause of the industry’ s ruination. The feds have since taken over.
While Guam doesn’ t have what the CNMI used to have, there’ s a lot to learn from our sister-territory’ s success and a lot to be wary of from its downfall.
It’ s a matter of knowing and focusing on what we can do within our control and navigating it properly to our advantage instead of agonizing over the chaos in Washington, D. C.
Publisher / Editor-in-Chief Mar-Vic Cagurangan publisher @ pacificislandtimes. com
Contributing Writers Raquel Bagnol Ron Rocky Coloma Phillip Cruz Zaldy Dandan Ongerung Kambes Kesolei Theodore Lewis Bryan Manabat Joyce McClure Gabriel McCoard Jack Niedenthal James C. Pearce Robert Underwwod Jayvee Vallejera Aline Yamashita
Sales and Marketing Executive Jan SN Furukawa jan @ pacificislandtimes. com
Administrative Assistant Jinky Villanueva jinky. pacificislandtimes @ gmail. com jinkyvillanueva303 @ yahoo. com
***
Pacific Independent News Service LLC Tumon Sands Plaza 1082 Pale San Vitores Rd. Tumon Guam 96931
Mailing address: P. O. Box 11647 Tamuning, Gu 96931 Telephone:( 671) 929-4210 Email: pacificislandtimes @ gmail. com Website: www. pacificislandtimes. com
The Pacific Island Times is published monthly and circulated in Guam and Palau by the Pacific Independent News Service LLC. Editorial and advertising submissions become property of the Pacific Island Times and cannot be lifted without consent of the publisher. Views and opinions from contributors do not necessarily represent the editorial position of the Pacific Island Times.