What British Muslims Really Think | Page 526
Page 119
Survey of Muslims - Control Group
CATI Fieldwork : 5th - 7th June 2015
Absolutes/col percents
Table 104
Q14. Some people think that violence is justified in some situations, while others think that violence is never justified. For each of the following
examples, please tell me whether you sympathise with or condemn people who take part in ...
- Violence organised by groups to protect their own religion
Base: All respondents
Q5. Which of the following best reflects your religious beliefs?
Total
NET:
Any
Relig
-ion
(a)
Christ
-ian
(b)
Budd
-hist
(c)
Hindu
(d)
Jewish
(e)
Muslim
(f)
Sikh
(g)
Ethnicity
Other
(h)
None
(i)
White
(j)
Mixed
(k)
Asian
(l)
Working Status
Black
(m)
Other
(n)
Working
(o)
Not
Working
(p)
Influence
Decisions
Affecting
Britain (Q2)
Disability
Yes
(q)
No
(r)
Agree
(s)
Disagree
(t)
Feelings Towards Muslim
People (QS1)
Not
FavourFavable
Neutral
ourable
(51-100)
(50)
(0-49)
(u)
(v)
(w)
Unweighted base
1008
632
548
8
5
9
20
5
37
365
878
26
24
19
11
584
424
196
791
222
578
388
386
234
Weighted base
1008
628
541
7**
6**
6**
23**
8**
38*
370
866
28**
31**
23**
11**
570
438
190
798
215
573
380
393
235
2
7%
-
2
6%
-
-
-
NET: Sympathise
71
7%
50
8%
45
8%
-
-
2
29%
21
6%
64
7%
2
8%
-
1
4%
-
35
6%
36
8%
15
8%
55
7%
22
10%
39
7%
28
7%
26
7%
17
7%
-
10
1%
-
-
-
-
5
1%
5
1%
2
1%
7
1%
5
3%
4
1%
4
1%
3
1%
3
1%
Completely
sympathise
(5)
10
1%
10
2%i
10
2%i
-
-
*
7%
Sympathise to some
extent
(4)
61
6%
40
6%
35
6%
-
-
1
22%
2
7%
-
2
6%
21
6%
55
6%
2
8%
-
1
4%
-
29
5%
31
7%
13
7%
47
6%
16
8%
35
6%
24
6%
23
6%
14
6%
Neither sympathise
nor condemn
(3)
125
12%
68
11%
59
11%
1
10%
-
-
5
21%
-
3
7%
56
15%
110
13%
4
14%
4
14%
1
3%
1
5%
76
13%
49
11%
24
12%
99
12%
27
13%
64
11%
46
12%
60
15%w
19
8%
Condemn to some
extent
(2)
197
20%
122
19%
99
18%
2
31%
1
20%
1
10%
4
16%
5
66%
10
26%
72
19%
163
19%
2
6%
11
35%
7
31%
6
50%
116
20%
81
19%
31
16%
163
20%
38
18%
106
19%
85
22%w
79
20%
33
14%
Completely condemn
(1)
611
61%
388
62%
337
62%
4
58%
5
80%
4
61%
13
56%
3
34%
23
61%
218
59%
526
61%
20
72%
16
51%
14
61%
5
46%
343
60%
268
61%
119
63%
479
60%
127
59%
360
63%
220
58%
225
57%
165
70%uv
808
80%
510
81%
436
81%
6
90%
6
100%
4
71%
17
71%
8
100%
33
87%
290
78%
689
80%
22
78%
27
86%
21
92%
11
95%
459
80%
349
80%
150
79%
642
81%
165
77%
467
81%
305
80%
304
77%
198
85%v
4
*
1
*
1
*
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
*
-
-
-
-
1
*
3
1%
2
1%
2
*
1
*
3
*
1
*
NET: Condemn
Don't know
3
1%
3
1%
-
Mean
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.52
1.20
2.04
1.80
1.66
1.57
1.67
1.68
1.58
1.63
1.51
1.59
1.66
1.67
1.66
1.67
1.76
1.62
1.70
1.71w
1.54
Standard deviation
Standard error
0.98
0.03
1.01
0.04
1.02
0.04
0.73
0.26
0.44
0.20
1.60
0.53
1.04
0.23
0.51
0.23
0.86
0.14
0.93
0.05
0.99
0.03
1.01
0.20
0.73
0.15
0.78
0.18
0.61
0.18
0.96
0.04
1.01
0.05
1.01
0.07
0.97
0.03
1.09
0.07
0.96
0.04
0.98
0.05
0.98
0.05
0.96
0.06
Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i - j/k/l/m/n - o/p - q/r - s/t - u/v/w
Overlap formulae used. * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing
Prepared for Channel 4 and Juniper by ICM