What British Muslims Really Think | Page 526

Page 119 Survey of Muslims - Control Group CATI Fieldwork : 5th - 7th June 2015 Absolutes/col percents Table 104 Q14. Some people think that violence is justified in some situations, while others think that violence is never justified. For each of the following examples, please tell me whether you sympathise with or condemn people who take part in ... - Violence organised by groups to protect their own religion Base: All respondents Q5. Which of the following best reflects your religious beliefs? Total NET: Any Relig -ion (a) Christ -ian (b) Budd -hist (c) Hindu (d) Jewish (e) Muslim (f) Sikh (g) Ethnicity Other (h) None (i) White (j) Mixed (k) Asian (l) Working Status Black (m) Other (n) Working (o) Not Working (p) Influence Decisions Affecting Britain (Q2) Disability Yes (q) No (r) Agree (s) Disagree (t) Feelings Towards Muslim People (QS1) Not FavourFavable Neutral ourable (51-100) (50) (0-49) (u) (v) (w) Unweighted base 1008 632 548 8 5 9 20 5 37 365 878 26 24 19 11 584 424 196 791 222 578 388 386 234 Weighted base 1008 628 541 7** 6** 6** 23** 8** 38* 370 866 28** 31** 23** 11** 570 438 190 798 215 573 380 393 235 2 7% - 2 6% - - - NET: Sympathise 71 7% 50 8% 45 8% - - 2 29% 21 6% 64 7% 2 8% - 1 4% - 35 6% 36 8% 15 8% 55 7% 22 10% 39 7% 28 7% 26 7% 17 7% - 10 1% - - - - 5 1% 5 1% 2 1% 7 1% 5 3% 4 1% 4 1% 3 1% 3 1% Completely sympathise (5) 10 1% 10 2%i 10 2%i - - * 7% Sympathise to some extent (4) 61 6% 40 6% 35 6% - - 1 22% 2 7% - 2 6% 21 6% 55 6% 2 8% - 1 4% - 29 5% 31 7% 13 7% 47 6% 16 8% 35 6% 24 6% 23 6% 14 6% Neither sympathise nor condemn (3) 125 12% 68 11% 59 11% 1 10% - - 5 21% - 3 7% 56 15% 110 13% 4 14% 4 14% 1 3% 1 5% 76 13% 49 11% 24 12% 99 12% 27 13% 64 11% 46 12% 60 15%w 19 8% Condemn to some extent (2) 197 20% 122 19% 99 18% 2 31% 1 20% 1 10% 4 16% 5 66% 10 26% 72 19% 163 19% 2 6% 11 35% 7 31% 6 50% 116 20% 81 19% 31 16% 163 20% 38 18% 106 19% 85 22%w 79 20% 33 14% Completely condemn (1) 611 61% 388 62% 337 62% 4 58% 5 80% 4 61% 13 56% 3 34% 23 61% 218 59% 526 61% 20 72% 16 51% 14 61% 5 46% 343 60% 268 61% 119 63% 479 60% 127 59% 360 63% 220 58% 225 57% 165 70%uv 808 80% 510 81% 436 81% 6 90% 6 100% 4 71% 17 71% 8 100% 33 87% 290 78% 689 80% 22 78% 27 86% 21 92% 11 95% 459 80% 349 80% 150 79% 642 81% 165 77% 467 81% 305 80% 304 77% 198 85%v 4 * 1 * 1 * - - - - - - 3 * - - - - 1 * 3 1% 2 1% 2 * 1 * 3 * 1 * NET: Condemn Don't know 3 1% 3 1% - Mean 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.52 1.20 2.04 1.80 1.66 1.57 1.67 1.68 1.58 1.63 1.51 1.59 1.66 1.67 1.66 1.67 1.76 1.62 1.70 1.71w 1.54 Standard deviation Standard error 0.98 0.03 1.01 0.04 1.02 0.04 0.73 0.26 0.44 0.20 1.60 0.53 1.04 0.23 0.51 0.23 0.86 0.14 0.93 0.05 0.99 0.03 1.01 0.20 0.73 0.15 0.78 0.18 0.61 0.18 0.96 0.04 1.01 0.05 1.01 0.07 0.97 0.03 1.09 0.07 0.96 0.04 0.98 0.05 0.98 0.05 0.96 0.06 Proportions/Means: Columns Tested (5% risk level) - a/b/c/d/e/f/g/h/i - j/k/l/m/n - o/p - q/r - s/t - u/v/w Overlap formulae used. * small base; ** very small base (under 30) ineligible for sig testing Prepared for Channel 4 and Juniper by ICM