advisory. With respect to content, divine reason and human reason must be sufficiently analogous that human beings can reason about what God likely wills. Locke takes it for granted that since God created us with reason in order to follow God ' s will, human reason and divine reason are sufficiently similar that natural law will not seem arbitrary to us. Those interested in the contemporary relevance of Locke ' s political theory must confront its theological aspects. Straussians make Locke ' s theory relevant by claiming that the theological dimensions of his thought are primarily rhetorical; they are“ cover” to keep him from being persecuted by the religious authorities of his day. Others, such as Dunn, take Locke to be of only limited relevance to contemporary politics precisely because so many of his arguments depend on religious assumptions that are no longer widely shared. More recently a number of authors, such as Simmons and Vernon, have tried to separate the foundations of Locke ' s argument from other aspects of it. Simmons, for example, argues that Locke ' s thought is over-determined, containing both religious and secular arguments. He claims that for Locke the fundamental law of nature is that“ as much as possible mankind is to be preserved”( Two Treatises 135). At times, he claims, Locke presents this principle in rule-consequentialist terms: it is the principle we use to determine the more specific rights and duties that all have. At other times, Locke hints at a more Kantian justification that emphasizes the impropriety of treating our equals as if they were mere means to our ends. Waldron, in his most recent work on Locke, explores the opposite claim: that Locke ' s theology actually provides a more solid basis for his premise of political equality than do contemporary secular approaches that tend to simply assert equality. With respect to the specific content of natural law, Locke never