WFP Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific - 2016 SPRs RBB 2016 SPRs by country | Seite 595

Standard Project Report 2016
Annual Project Food Distribution
Commodity
Planned Distribution (mt)
Ready To Use Supplementary Food
Rice
Split Lentils
Total
Actual Distribution (mt)
% Actual v. Planned
9 - -
2,263 2,922 129.1%
408 582 142.7%
2,680 3,504 130.8%
Cash Based Transfer and Commodity Voucher Distribution for the
Project (USD)
Modality
Planned (USD)
Cash
Total
Actual (USD)
% Actual v. Planned
1,849,950 4,000,113 216.2%
1,849,950 4,000,113 216.2%
Operational Partnerships
WFP worked with six cooperating partners in the final months of the earthquake response, and by December 2015,
food assistance for assets (FFA) activities and food and cash distributions were still pending completion. Therefore,
WFP’s six partners extended their support into January 2016, when partners implemented food and cash
distributions and managed beneficiary registrations in SCOPE, WFP's beneficiary and transfer management
platform. Partner staff-members utilised project management techniques that they learned from WFP in 2015 by
mobilising communities and providing technical supervision for the rehabilitation of community assets.
In January 2016, WFP partners completed all remaining CR-EMOP activities from 2015. Support for Poor
Producers in Nepal completed FFA activities and food distributions in Gorkha district. The Social Empowerment and
Building Accessibility Centre implemented FFA activities in Sindupalchowk district using both general food
distribution and cash-based transfer modalities. Himalayan Health Care implemented pending FFA activities and
continued food distributions in Dhading district. Development Project Service Centre carried out food distributions in
Dolakha district. WFP’s long-term partner Manahari Development Institute carried out food and cash distributions for
the remaining FFA activities in Sindupalchowk district and supported beneficiaries with food distributions for work
done in Kavrepalanchok district. Samaritan’s Purse completed pending cash distributions in Nuwakot district.
Although WFP had anticipated that its partners would contribute about 20 percent of the total CR-EMOP funding,
they only contributed 10 percent by the end of the project, mostly through associated costs. The contribution by
partners was smaller than anticipated as a result of two factors. First, when compared to smaller partner
organizations, WFP had a substantial resourcing advantage with donor governments for the CR-EMOP. Second,
partners who planned to contribute raw materials for the FFA projects could not do so because of the countrywide
fuel shortages and resulting transport issues encountered.
Performance Monitoring
In 2016, WFP’s field-based programme teams in Gorkha, Nuwakot, Sindhupalchowk and Dhading districts
continued the monthly plan to carry out general project monitoring. The teams also worked with community-based
project management committees (also known as user committees), Village Development Committees, and the Ward
Citizens’ Forum to ensure that activities were completed on time and that the intended beneficiaries received their
correct entitlements according to the distribution plan.
Nepal, State of (NP)
20
Single Country EMOP - 200668