Water, Sewage & Effluent March-April 2018 | Page 40

Aquatic toxicology in South Africa Forty years ago, water pollution relied solely on chemical analysis. Technology has since evolved to include a battery of protocols to assess the impact of pollution on aquatic biota. By Anna Loots T he South African Bill of Rights states that everyone has the right: (a) to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well- being; and (b) to have the environment protected, for the benefit of present and future generations, through reasonable legislative and other measures that: (i) prevent pollution and ecological degradation; (ii) promote conservation; and (iii) secure ecologically sustainable development and use of natural resources while promoting justifiable economic and social development. However, together with these intrinsic human rights exists every individual’s own responsibility for looking after his/ her environment. The function of aquatic toxicology Aquatic toxicology determines the effects when living organisms within an aquatic environment are exposed to toxic chemicals, and in the National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998), Chapter 3 focuses on protection of the water resource itself. For the past four decades, standard practice for the Department of Wa t e r a n d S a n i t a t i o n ( D W S ) t o control water pollution relied solely on chemical analysis, and it was generally accepted that chemical monitoring was sufficient to provide the framework for water quality and effluent management. This applied mainly to industries’ discharge and water samples from dams, rivers, and streams. Although very valuable, the chemical testing approach to determining pollutants had proved to be insufficient to assess the actual impact of pollution on aquatic biota. In the meantime, many other countries 38 (for example Germany, Canada, the United States of America, and New Zealand) had researched, developed, and successfully applied standardised toxicity test protocols. Limits were set and had led to routine toxicity testing for compliance and regulatory monitoring. Subsequently, the DWS implemented its own extensive water quality network for South Africa, based on routine sampling of water bodies and analysing samples for their chemical profile. The Management of Complex Industrial Waste Water: Introducing the Direct Estimation of the Ecological Effect Potential (DEEEP) approach by the then Department of Water Affairs and Forestry in 2003, is a recommended battery of tests that can measure toxicity of complex mixtures, even if all the constituents are not known. High biochemical/chemical oxygen demand (COD<200mg/ℓ or BOD<50mg/ℓ) Acute toxicity (Battery of tests including bacteria, algae, invertebrates and vertebrates) Chronic toxicity Mutagenicity This battery of tests supports the Driepootpot approach. Water Sewage & Effluent March/April 2018 Bioaccumulation