Water, Sewage & Effluent July-August 2017 | Page 7

Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection is now a standard feature in most wastewater treatment systems. UV has also been embraced by the drinking water community as an effective barrier against chlorine-tolerant organisms such as cryptosporidium and Giardia. The technology is widely favoured in wastewater treatment due to its non-chemical nature, the fact that no subsequent de-chlorination process is required, and its ability to be unselective in disinfection performance. Consulting engineers sometimes overlook the recent progress in UV technology and the impact that hydraulics can have on UV system performance by continuing to place UV lamps in open channels. A more efficient approach is to contain the waste stream in a pipe and disinfect the fluid in a closed vessel. UV light works by causing permanent damage to the DNA found in all living species. Once the DNA becomes damaged, the organism is unable to carry out the routine cell functions of respiration, the assimilation of food, and replication. Once the cell is rendered non-viable, the organism quickly dies. The difference in UV system efficiency from the various UV manufactures was made transparent with the advent of UV system validation using bioassay techniques. The techniques have been well established for drinking water and are being investigated for use in wastewater. A bioassay involves the introduction of non-pathogenic organisms (bio- dosimeter) into the fluid stream before the UV system. The entire procedure is performed under controlled conditions and system variables: flow, transmittance, power loads, and lamp intensity are carefully recorded as samples are taken before and after the UV system. Once the sample data is returned from the analysing laboratory, the actual system’s ability to disinfect can be compared to the manufacturer’s estimation. Of course, such bioassays should be carried out under the inspection of a credible third party. As bioassay validations became the standard, design engineers started to notice how water hydraulics play a vital and often overlooked role in system performance. In essence, if a UV system design allows short circuits Transforming water, enriching life An open channel system. or poor turbulence, then the water will receive differing degrees of UV dose. In extreme cases, the water can short- circuit straight through a UV system, rendering it inefficient. Most UV systems need to cope with a variety of flow rates, and usually an operating flow range is considered when designing the UV system. A persuasive case can be made to put the UV system for wastewater disinfection into a closed pipe to ensure optimised hydraulics and to prevent the operator from the exposure to the wastewater and the UV light. Dead zones or spaces can be formed within the channel, which leads to short circuiting and untreated water. Erratic or reduced inactivation performance caused by poor hydraulics can create density currents that cause incoming wastewater to flow along the top or bottom of the lamp banks, resulting in short circuits and poor disinfection. Flow straighteners can introduce new problems. It’s not unusual for a submerged perforated diffuser to have an open area of less than 20% of the cross- sectional area of the open channel — head-loss and overflow problems can then exist. Under-sized channel width and depth can create very high velocities and can reduce the residence time required for adequate UV dose delivery. Large open water sur faces can lead to fly and mosquito nuisance and cause corrosion of electrical components due to the elevated humidity. Level control is vital, but fragile. The level of the fluid in the channel must be carefully controlled. Advantages of closed vessel UV treatment • Savings: The reduced number of lamps, quartz, and reduced footprint of closed vessel design, will considerably reduce the capital expenditure cost of a project. The ‘end-feed’ closed vessel chamber design removes the requirement for large civil structures, while the high output 800W Amalgam UV lamps provide a significantly increased treatment capacity, with energy efficiency and reduced consumable components. • O p e r a t i o n a n d m a i n t e n a n c e advantage: The ETS-UVTM designs offer the highest UV output with the fewest number of lamps, in the smallest footprint currently available in the UV market. Operational costs, including power, lamps, sleeves, power supplies, and maintenance, can be 15–20% less when compared to traditional open channel systems. u Water Sewage & Effluent July/August 2017 5