Washington Business Summer 2015 | Page 18

washington business 360 With respect to climate policy, what is the best approach for Washington? (continued) an energy vision for the future — washington state style putting a price on carbon gives businesses flexibility Sen. Doug Ericksen Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon 3. Research and Development: As a hydro and nuclear state, the best contribution we can make to reducing carbon worldwide is through R&D at top-tier research universities. We cannot legislate technological breakthroughs, but we can invest in those who are working to make new and cleaner energy a reality. 4. Converting our ferry fleet to liquid natural gas (LNG): If we pass SB 5735 in the next legislative session, companies could meet current requirements by investing in the conversion of the Washington ferry fleet to LNG. Gas tax dollars would go to roads, not LNG conversions, our dollars would stay in state cleaning up our air, and renewable natural gas from our landfills could be used to power our Evergreen ferry fleet — all while keeping energy costs low and creating new jobs here at home. These solutions are practical, achievable, and based on the energy realities of today while having a vision for the energy needs of the future. Washington state is leading. We can become the innovation leader, not the taxation leader. We can keep energy costs low, support new energy technologies and protect our manufacturing job base. or the renewable portfolio standard passed by Washington voters in 2006. Instead of setting one-size-fits-all standards, a price on carbon gives businesses more flexibility to meet global emissions reduction needs. A carbon price accounts for the market distortions created when society pays for the external costs of carbon emissions — increased asthma rates, water shortages, negative impacts on forestry and fishing, to name just a few. We do not have a choice as to whether or not we will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. Here are the choices we have: WHEN will we begin to reduce emissions? The costs both of making a sudden transition to a new energy mix and of global warming itself will get greater every year we delay action. And HOW will we reduce emissions? With a market-friendly carbon price? A suite of old-fashioned industrial policies that pick winners and losers? Or, perhaps if we wait too long, both? As business leaders, you will be affected by whatever choices we make — action or inaction, action now or action later. We will all be better off if you help us answer these questions sooner than later. 18 association of washington business