When our elected politicians state unequivocally, and without grounds or reason, that the most recent Islamic atrocity “has nothing to do with Islam” do they think that the contempt they are displaying is worthy of respect, let alone our vote? Surely they realise they would gain more credibility and the popularity they crave if they actually had the balls to state the obvious?
The truth can be a tricky subject. I have been receiving death threats ever since I started my @JihadistJoe Twitter account for telling the truth about Islam. This was to be expected, it’s why I regularly tweet, “You may be Muslim if: you’re outraged at tweets saying Islam is violent, but then threaten Tweeps with violence to prove Islam is peaceful”.
What I did not expect was the response I received from mainly far left wing appeasers and the so called anti Islamist fraternity of bloggers, who value social acceptance above the cold hard truth. Their reluctance to accept the uncomfortable truth is the type of ‘look the other way’ cowardly attitude that resulted in anything from 1,400 to 1,000,000 children being systematically sexually abused across the UK.
People often fall into the trap of thinking I’m an uninformed idiot and challenge my knowledge of Islam. Having read the Qur’an several times and, most alarmingly, in chronological order, with the abrogated verses removed, and also in its original Arabic form (assisted by an Egyptian apostate that fled her homeland when her mother was ‘honour killed’) I have a clear understanding of the ideology of Islam. My clarity on the subject is assisted by the fact that I am not pressured by peers at the risk of death, as most believers are.
Many people accuse me of being anti-Muslim, nothing could be further from the truth. Because I have a clear understanding of its nature, goals and tactics, I understand more than most that the first victims of Islam are its adherents. Islam means submission, Muslim means one that submits unequivocally to the commands of the Qur’an. This is an ingot around the necks of even the most peaceful of adherents.
Dualism is the foundation and the key to understanding Islam. The qualities it manifests, peaceful or radical, depend upon the circumstances. There are ‘two’ Qur’ans, the Qur’an of Mecca, which covers the early period of Muhammed when he had no power, and the later Qur’an of Medina that portrays an emboldened Muhammed, with military power and the means to enforce his will.
Many contradictions are found in the Qur’an, but as it’s considered the perfect word of Allah both contradicting verses are considered sacred and true, with the later verses being ‘better’ and therefore true, but the earlier verses cannot be wrong because it is the word of Allah and perfect. Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic and only circumstance dictates which verse is used.
Western logic is based on the law of contradiction, “if two things contradict, then one of them must be false”, whereas Islamic logic is dualistic in which two things can contradict and both still be true.
There is no such thing as humanity in Islam only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. A Muslim cannot lie, cheat, kill or steal from another Muslim, but may deceive, lie or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam.
I’m often told by ‘useful idiots’ that, “I know loads of Muslims and they are all really nice”. This I do not doubt as there are millions of Muslims, particularly in the West, that follow a watered down, westernised version of Islam that would have Muhammed turning in his grave. By the true Qur’anic definition, the degree to which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.
Islam is political in nature with the goal of global domination by any means. Jihad is the pinnacle of Islam, this is where all rules go out of the window as it is its highest priority and why ISIS find justification in Islam for everything they do. Islam, in its purest form, in the way their prophet practiced it, is a political, supremacist, totalitarian, misogynistic, racist, homophobic, ideology rooted in far right-wing fascism that is currently being welcomed by the far left in western societies, validating the claim of a revered western leader when he said, “The fascists of the future will be called anti fascists”.
I, for one, am more than happy to be labelled intolerant for my views. In fact I’m proud to say that I am intolerant of intolerance. Tolerance of the intolerant is cowardice. I accept that one day I may be killed for my views, but in the words of Stephane Charbonnier, “I would rather die on my feet, than live on my knees”.
Vive Charlie!!!