VISION Issue 6 | Page 14

14 Vision Magazine Deflected light, breeze, ingeniously concealed hinges and latches, custom-designed furniture and streamlined surfaces are all clues to something very special. Such visions might seem ephemeral to the role of architect and yet Wardle ensures the construction language has those glider-like qualities. And there is the emphatic, unequivocal sense to his work. Every part has a purpose rather than adding excess baggage. Even his hand-railings are exemplary. Producing a staircase is a good test of an architect and handrails that celebrate the occasion all the more so. Glass is quietly spectacular, dissolving the envelope unobtrusively to views and light in quite magical ways. “Our architecture has a strong narrative,” Wardle says of the story telling process that reflects the lives of all parties involved. “It should tell a story appropriate to its place and the ideas of everyone involved. I want architecture to go beyond the first appearance and reveal new layers on each and every visit.” His work embodies the idea of not fitting people into arbitrary or willfully conceived shapes. His designs mould to site and around clients. It’s a view fundamentally based on sharing ideas and an enjoyment of working with people. Wardle’s passion for quality comes across as the gift that keeps on giving. “I have a powerful belief in architecture as a transformative experience,” he says. “What I’m most pleased about our practice is the breadth of reach, from small coastal houses to large residential and high-rise commercial towers, to university buildings.” This latest residence hardly puts Wardle on the map – he’s already there – but it reinforces how good clients can be introduced to an extraordinary way to live. Vision editor Peter Hyatt speaks with John Wardle about a house already the modern classic: What does the success of a second Robin Boyd Award mean? When awards come I am very deliberate to make sure that any recognition is shared. Leo Schofield recently described a building of ours in Tasmania as ‘this big grey beached whale’ so the reviews aren’t always positive. When you put yourself out into the public realm - which is what architects do - you have to be prepared for criticism. When good reviews come along I endeavour to share that around. Your work is highly legible. How do you ensure that signature suits every client? Our designs have never been from the hand of one master architect. What I do enjoy about the practice of architecture is a process that really involves creative input from many people working together. The project can be as small as a house, to a large university building, or office tower. Is there a single biggest influence? There have been various influences. Elements of our work refer to Alvar Aalto, Rudolph Schindler, Japanese architecture, Boyd Desbrowe Annear and other fine Australian architects. One of my first influences being lectured by Peter Corrigan was Louis Kahn and still to this day he is a great point of reference. Kahn’s Fisher House is very influential as is Pierre Chareau’s astonishing glass house in Paris, the Maison de Verre. Was there a moment in your career when you thought: ‘I’ve finally worked this caper out.’? Right View along main passage from front entrance towards ocean reveals splintered, kaleidoscopic light. Not really in a single moment. It really goes back to your point about how good we are, or not. I tend to be very self-critical. The repercussions of my visits to a building site reverberate right through the practice and building team. Because the building process is reasonably slow it at least allows for subtle modification through the course of construction. Fortunately the builder here provided a great team. They communicated incredibly well, delivered on, or under time and built beautifully.