VISION Issue 23 | Page 10

VISION 23 — BACK TO THE FUTURE Those mid-Century modernists, suffered from the availability of quite inferior materials by today’s standards. This house is something they could only have dreamed about. You’re right. They reduced the thickness of everything and introduced industrial methods and materials for those houses. We tried here to hide how the house was constructed. We tell our clients minimalism and simplicity is hard to achieve because we have to hide the way it all comes together. Residential design is often regarded as unprofitable and a disproportionate headache for the effort. Is it worth it for the architect? I always tell people our office does commercial and residential. Commercial basically pays for the residential. Residential is by far the most personally rewarding, but financially, I understand why many architectural offices refuse it. What was the real opportunity—and test? The opportunity was to experiment with materials – concrete and glass. We design, with certain rules: “In this design, one of the rules was that the external east and west walls were to be of solid concrete. Everything in between is lightweight. It’s lightweight materials, timber cladding or walls of glass.” That was a rule we carried through all the way while stepping down the site. Any issues reaching a 6-star energy rating? To achieve the concrete finish inside and out took a lot of effort. We had to sandwich insulation within the 6-inch concrete wall and of course, that obviously influenced the choice of glass. We chose Viridian ComfortPlusTM. Being a predominantly glass-house, it had to deliver that energy rating and function beautifully. 10