Virginia Golfer January/February 2014 | Page 38

Golf writer John Paul Newport has plenty to celebrate, having played some of the best courses in the world. He believes part of golf’s appeal lies in its demand. John Paul Newport, a Wall Street Journal columnist, book author and golfer, contemplates his angle on some of the game’s issues A As the golf scribe for The Wall Street Journal, Journal John Paul Newport has established himself as one of the media’s leading voices on the sport. Since 2006 he has written the newspaper’s weekly Golf Journal column, which touches on a multitude of subjects. Newport also unabashedly tried his hand on professional golf’s developmental circuit for one year in an effort to qualify for the PGA Tour, chronicled in his book The Fine Green Line. His wife may have thought he was crazy at the time, but she also recognized that when a writer has a book idea, there’s no stopping it from coming to fruition. Newport recently spent time talking to Virginia Golfer about a myriad of subjects affecting the game. He delved into the Brandel Chamblee-Tiger Woods incident, what he would do if he was commissioner of the PGA Tour for one week, and why he tried his hand on mini-tours for one year. VIRGINIA GOLFER: How would you rate what the United States Golf Association and the R&A have done for golf in the last couple of years as “keepers of the game?” JOHN PAUL NEWPORT: I definitely believe they are making strides in the right direction. The USGA in particular is trying to move away from the dandruff-covered blue coat stodginess of the past. They’re trying to include more public golfers in the way they think about the world. The 36 USGA has operated as an elitist organization through most of its history, so I give credit to [executive director] Mike Davis and [former executive director] David Fay before him. They still have a ways to go, I think, in really convincing the world that golf is not an exclusive elitist game, and to somehow bring all the parties together to address the distance and sustainability issues. That is a real knotty type of problem. I give them credit for that. The R&A is lagging a little bit behind, but they are working together. VG: Recently you wrote that golf “ought to be fun and fast, loose and casual, not to mention a lot less costly.” There has been a push to make the game more accessible and fun with programs such as Golf 20/20, Tee It Forward and Play Nine, for example. What are your ideas to pull all this together? V IRGINIA G OLFER | J ANUARY/F EBRUARY 2014 Master_VSGA_JanFeb_2014_v20.indd 36 VG: OK, Tim Finchem allows you to be PGA Tour commissioner for one week. What do you do? JPN: That’s a great question. My answer would be to make playing rapidly one of the skills that the PGA T our events test for in players. If there was some way to devise a system—I don’t know the mechanism exactly—where it’s not just skill and course management, but also the ability to do that in a limited time frame, so that it becomes a specific part of the challenge. It would actually become part of what it is to be a successful golfer. It would eliminate some golfers now. If they’re not able to do it, and other golfers that aren’t on the PGA Tour who can play fast would become successful on the PGA Tour. Most other sports have a clock. I don’t want to see race golf. But I would figure out a mechanism like that and the benefit to the rest of the golfing world would be enormous because the standard they would see on television would be ‘fast.’ JOHN PAUL NEWPORT; ILLUSTRATION: GETTY IMAGES The Curious Writer’s Breadth JPN: One of the fundamental issues is whether or not golf is meant to be a sport for everybody. And I don’t mean that in terms of whether it is meant to be elite or for the common people. Everyone wants to be part of a thriving enterprise, and they want to feel like it is healthy. If it’s growing, you feel better about the game and the hours you spent toiling in the fairways. It’s fun to be part of a healthy thing and people like it to grow, but are the interests of those vested in seeing growth in the game the same as those who play golf? For me that’s a real fundamental question. For people who want to make the game more accessible and easier, I would say self-correcting clubs and golf balls, as well as bigger 8-inch diameter holes, don’t necessarily make it more fun. At whate