Virginia Episcopalian Magazine Spring 2012 Issue | Page 15

RESTRUCTURING A CENTRAL FOCUS AT GENERAL CONVENTION JP CAUSEY The 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church meets in Indianapolis, Ind., July 5-12, 2012. General Convention consists of a House of Bishops, of which all bishops are members, and a House of Deputies, which is comprised of up to four clerical and four lay deputies from each diocese. The Episcopal Church Women’s Triennial meets concurrently with the General Convention and the event attracts many church-related groups, vendors and other interested people. Upwards of 10,000 people are expected in Indianapolis for the meetings and related events. General Convention is the legislature for the Episcopal Church and has the sole power to amend the constitution and canons, revise the Book of Common Prayer or the Church Hymnal, adopt a triennial budget and pass resolutions for the Church. It operates as a bicameral legislature and for an action to be an action of General Convention, it needs to be approved by both the House of Bishops and the House of Deputies. Issues expected to be considered at the 77th General Convention include: • A triennial budget for the church, including  the askings to the dioceses for the support of the Episcopal Church; • Consideration of whether to sign  the Anglican Covenant; • Election of a Nominating  Committee to nominate the successor of the Rt. Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, whose term as presiding bishop expires in 2015; • Consideration of possible liturgies to  recognize same-sex unions; • Restructuring. Restructuring is expected to be an overarching discussion because of its widespread impact on the organization and its finances. Restructuring is not a new issue for General Convention, but prior attempts at major structural changes has been largely stymied and there is a new urgency to it as membership and financial resources dwindle. Renewed efforts to review the structure of the Church commenced shortly after the 76th General Convention in 2009 and the Executive Council and several other groups began to engage the issue. Their focus was on what kind of structure would best enable the church to carry out its mission, while keeping in mind the structural safeguards for the roles of bishop, clergy and lay people. By early 2011, the Executive Council felt that, while good progress on ideas for restructuring was being made in various groups, those efforts were in some cases overlapping and in some cases diverging. At the behest of the Executive Council, a consultation was convened in May of 2011 with representation from the Executive Council, including the presiding bishop and the president of the House of Deputies, and representatives of several other commissions and agencies. The outcome will be reflected in the report of the Standing Commission on the Structure of the Church to General Convention, but the concept is one of “subsidiarity,” meaning developing and utilizing structures which place the major efforts (and financial support) at the lowest level on which the mission efforts can be effectively carried out, while still retaining an organizational structure which also generally preserves the balance our governance has between the power and authority of bishops, clergy and lay people. The discussion received additional impetus which the Rt. Rev. Stacy Sauls, who was appointed chief operating officer of the church in late May 2011, presented his own ideas on restructuring at a meeting of the House of Bishops. The issues of structure are complex and sensitive. It is essential that the issues be addressed intentionally and thoroughly, and that the impacts of any proposed changes be carefully evaluated to ascertain not only their effectiveness to improve the church’s work but also to not unintentionally