Vermont Bar Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 Winter 2015, Vol. 40, No. 4 | Page 21

BP: So fourteen states use the exam now. Have any of the remainder rejected it, decided against it as opposed to having it pending as it is here? BA: I don’t know. I can say that the New York Court of Appeals just put out for comment a proposal for New York to adopt the Uniform Bar Exam starting next July. That is not an endorsement by the Court yet, but it is an endorsement by the New York Board of Bar Examiners to put out that proposal. New York would add to the Uniform Bar Exam a one-hour, fiftyquestion multiple-choice test on New York law that you could take with the bar exam or at other times during the year. That would be a big change on the map of the Uniform Bar Exam if New York adopts that proposal, because they would be the first “mega” state to join. BP: If you know, and you may not know off the top of your head, where are we in terms of admissions in Vermont? I always think that we are at one hundred a year or so, but I don’t know who our brand new lawyers passing the bar exam for the first time, who’s waiving in through that program that you described earlier. BA: For 2013, it was almost 150, with one hundred admitted after the bar exam and forty-four admitted motion applicants. But you are right, before 2013 the number was around one hundred, sometimes lower, for a number of years. 2013 had a large law school class and was the first full year after the clerkship requirement was eliminated for lawyers admitted from other states. There’s no question that repla