F E AT U R E
But comparing our results to a baseline of
Zero, then we also have problems.
This is where the fear mongering and bull
crap tactics “what about the children” are
hatched!
This is such a loosely guided measurement
system. But the chemicals and compounds
we are measuring have been made out to
strike fear in the souls of the every mother
swaddling a baby and raising a teenager.
It’s hard to defend ingredients when there
is no true bar of acceptability.
One thing we know for sure: The more
heat applied, the more decomposition
takes place. This brings us to the only
control factor outside of ingredient contribution that we have.
Resistance.
The hotter you run your coils, the more
decomposition takes place, that is before
even considering the Catalyst effect which
is basically the introduction of two chemicals which makes an environment that
breeds other chemicals.
So what is safe and what is not? Well I
suppose that is what we are trying to determine. We have got a ball park idea that
certain chemicals should and can be avoided, such as, arsenic. Yeah we shouldn’t be
creating or adding that knowledgeably.
Acrolein, Ethylene glycol, Diacetyl, Diethylene glycol, sure these ones can be
actively avoided for the most part.
But this: Preservatives liable to release
formaldehyde… this is a crap ton harder,
and not even in direct context to what they
are outlying.
With or without preservatives, the actual
creation of formaldehyde in our products is
a result of many factors. As it is being used
as the biggest defense against our product
right now, as was Diacetyl a bit back it is
this one reasoning that makes it hard to
establish a guideline.
When our products are being tested, the
method in which they are being tested can
create those negative results.
Dry puffs and poorly timed intervals for
inhalation techniques, tanks that haven’t
been tested on they own for a baseline of
data to remove from the liquid data itself,
as well as at what point in the testing these
compounds are being measured for… All of
this affects results.
Hence a standard method needs to be
made.
But comparatively to our new designation
as a tobacco product, we are nothing like
our parent products. No matter what
anyone tells you, we can say without hesitation, that the results produced from this
round of TPD are nowhere near those negative results from cigarettes.
I have seen thousands of results, for both
products and I can attest to that.
But unsafe decomposition in this arena is
usually created by unsafe heat levels not
actually required to use the product in a
normal capacity.
Cloud chasers and tricksters choose a
different path, but keeping your heating
device for vaping products at lower temperatures can curb many of those negative
chemical decompositions.
In this case Resistance Is Futile.
RESISTANCE
52 VAPOUROUND MAGAZINE USA