Vapouround magazine Special Issue 02 | Page 21

NEWS • showing a customer how to install a battery • demonstrating how a device is put together • filling a tank with e-liquid • building or replacing a coil • swapping tanks It seems that this general assistance, the sort of thing that friendly, customerfocused vape store owners and staff do every day, would be regarded as ‘manufacturing’ because the final product is being assembled. Quite how that rule protects the public is difficult to understand but it actually gets worse…it is now illegal, under some circumstances, to make certain truthful statements about vaping in order to help your customers make informed choices about whether or not to vape. Specifically, since August 8, the label, labeling or advertising of vapor products may not “explicitly or implicitly” inform customers of the following facts: • that the primary purpose of electronic cigarettes is to provide a safer alterna tive to smoking • that electronic cigarettes do not contain any tobacco, and are there fore a tobacco product only in a legal/ regulatory sense • that electronic cigarettes contain much lower levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines and many other carcino gens than tobacco cigarettes and • that electronic cigarette use is much safer than smoking. So if you truthfully labeled or advertised an e-liquid with the words: “Contains no tobacco” you would be doing two things making a statement of fact and breaking the law. Mario Weaks who works at vape store The Vapor Spot in Sacramento, CA, told KCRA TV: “These new rules cut us off at the throat. The FDA doesn’t allow us to give any proper advice to customers on how to use vaporisers or how to work them properly.” And if you want to let a customer try a juice to determine whether they like it before buying, then forget it because giving away free samples is now also illegal. Andrew Osborne, the owner of Vapor Trail Electronics in Buffalo, New York state, told WIBV TV that the new 499 pages of federal regulations could cost small businesses hundreds of millions of dollars and could lead to the collapse of the industry within two years. He fears that the regulations could result in the big tobacco firms taking over the vaping industry as they would be the only ones who had the money to pay the fees needed to comply with the regulations. Osborne’s concerns were echoed by Ohio-based vape store owner Chris Voudris from Vapor Haus. Voudris told the Dayton Daily News that the FDA rules seemed tailored to wipe out the vape industry. He said: “This is going to wipe out the e-cigarette business and leave Big Tobacco running the industry.” The next major deadline is December 31, 2016 which is the cut off date for manufacturers (including importers) to register their manufacturing establishment(s) and individual products with the FDA in order for them to be sold after this date. “It seems that this general assistance, the sort of thing that friendly, customer-focused vape store owners and staff do every day would e regarded as manu acturing’ ecause the nal product is eing assem led.” VAPOUROUND MAGAZINE USA 19