Vapouround magazine Issue 05 | Page 22

NEWS 2 t par Having reflected, in the last issue, on how vapers could break free from the TPD by vaping without nicotine, VaperCrew’s MD, Melissa Morris, now looks at how this might affect the evolving industry. Concentrates and zero-nicotine products could, in a post-TPD market, become the proving ground for new eliquid flavours. The knowledgeable independent vape shops and online specialists, who are most likely to sell them, will be on the cutting-edge of new flavour trends, way before they hit the mainstream. And, as in fashion and many other industries, the most successful of these innovative flavours will eventually reach mass-produced late nicotine-containing products …six months later. So, let's reimagine the TPD after-party from the last issue, still using booze as our nicotine analogy. It’s a house party. The gang in the kitchen are on the store-bought booze. Those in the garden are booze-free and experimenting with new flavours. There is a small huddle of people in the lounge with a flask, topping up their own bottles. Talk of great new flavours and innovative blends merges with chatter about quality standards and emissions data. Everyone enjoys the conversation and there is no talk of anyone heading back to the smoking joint. Such a party is possible. Vapers can support those companies who notify and, as a result, pioneer product testing and deeper industry understanding, to make the party safer for everyone. And we can still support the smaller flavour specialists who continue to focus on developing great flavours, but offering them only as high-quality zero-nicotine eliquids and concentrates. Likewise, the industry itself can be mutually supportive: the ‘Big Boys Boys’ will need innovative, tried and tested flavours that are 22 ISSUE 05 VAPOUROUND MAGAZINE worth the expense of notifying - and the flavour specialists will need to engage with, and learn from, the knowledge of flavour safety gleaned from the Big Boys' testing. Like all good ecosystems, there should be 'big fish and little fish' in the vaping industry. As time goes on, lots of tasty little fish will undoubtedly get eaten by the big fish (read bought-out, not killed-off!) and, if it's a healthy ecosys tem, lots of new big and little fish will emerge. howeve one important caveat to this utopia. Rather There is, however, like the fragrance industry, we must grow up, play nicely, and adopt a respectful unilateral code of conduct around trade secrets and the protection of the intellectual property associated with unique flavour profiles, in order to attract, nurture and reward creative genius in the industry – but that's for another discussion. At the end of the da day, eliquids shouldn't purely be defined by whether or not they contain nicotine. Instead, they should be judged on quality - of ingredients, production standards, and flavours. That way, only the best, high-quality, fairly priced brands will survive - as a result of consumer demand, not imposed legislation dictating who should and shouldn't exist in the ecosystem in the first place.