Vanderbilt Political Review Winter 2015 | Page 17

DOMESTIC WINTER 2015 B order Patrol agents stopped Anastasio Hernández-Rojas on the California-Mexican border on May 28, 2010. A father of five American-born children, Rojas had resided lawfully in the United States for eighteen years. In early 2010, however, the Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) deported Rojas for shoplifting, separating him from his wife and children. When Border Patrol apprehended him, Rojas signed papers agreeing to return to Mexico. Agents subsequently drove him to the San Ysidro Border Crossing, but about twenty-five feet from the gate, a conflict broke out. Ten minutes later, Rojas was dead. The San Diego coroner’s office found that before dying of a heart attack, Rojas suffered “several loose teeth; bruising to his chest, stomach, hips, knees, back, lips, head and eyelids; five broken ribs; and a damaged spine.” The CBP insisted in a public statement that public dialogue until PBS broadcast the eyewitness video almost two years later. Only after sixteen Congressmen wrote a letter raising the issue in May 2012 did the Department of Justice open a general investigation into Rojas’ death. To date, the CBP has not released the names of the officials involved, nor have prosecutors charged a single officer with a criminal or civil offense. Immigration law is notoriously complex, but the Supreme Court has ruled time and time again that non-citizens in the United States retain certain Constitutional rights. However, legislative loopholes and poor oversight have allowed the Border Patrol to operate in a Constitutional grey area. This legal ambiguity results in Border Patrol agents routinely violating the rights of citizens and noncitizens alike. The use of excessive force has become routine. Moreover, CBP’s current internal discipline system fails to hold officers accountable. Pre ͥ