Vanderbilt Political Review Spring 2014 | Page 16

INTERVIEW terrorist or a criminal, and that’s why we want to look at their records. With the lawsuit, the other big thing for me is that right now these questions are being decided in secret. The President says, “fifteen judges have ruled this to be constitutional.” Well, he isn’t telling you the whole story. Most of these fifteen judges were in a secret court called the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance) court. If I’m the phone company, I’m not allowed to have a lawyer in the FISA court, and if I lose the judgment, which is done in secret so I have no representation, I can’t appeal it to another court. That to me is wrong, and I’m trying to change that legislatively as well. But it’s important that a constitutional question about the Fourth Amendment be decided in public, and I think because we live in a digital age where so much of our information is online now, that you do retain a property interest – a privacy interest – in that information even if the phone company holds it. People ne Yœ