Vanderbilt Political Review Fall 2015 | Page 10

DOMESTIC lution development advised by the proactive and transdisciplinary analysis. Effectual application of peace depends on the actualization of the intrinsic source justifying extremity and intractable needs. This prompts the undertaking of uncovering centuries worth of compounded influences at the grassroots to national level that shaped human motivation. The effect of nation building, history of war, religion, culture, ethnicity, socioeconomic dynamics, contemporary and traditional ideologies intersect in cre- VANDERBILT POLITICAL REVIEW established. In the Vanderbilt case, the justice system is clearly flawed for its insensitivity towards potential psychological derangement, but even more so for not markedly defining the immorality of rape. The “I’m the Girl That Ratted” campaign and the brave testimonies by Bosnian women in The Hague were efforts to validate unrecognized experiences. There cannot be gray areas or victim discretization if one is to resolve and then prevent human rights abuse. Bystander mentality and ignorance must transform into principals of increases with more foreign aid in an ethnically divided society though not in an ethnically homogenous one”) or the thought-process of attorneys and traditional psychologists who blame the rape victim for being in a state of mind that warrants environmental manipulation and their inability to overcome trauma only proclaims a culture of individual blame, self-segregation, and apathy. This culture of violence projects a cycle that houses acts of human degradation. Rape is the symptom of gender discrimination and the As showcased by the incredible strength of Bosnian Muslim women, survivors have the power of shaping the narrative and the extent of how much destructive evil will carry over into their response. The women of Srebrenica did not allow their abuse to predetermine the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina. They did not let rape translate into rape culture. ating the complexity behind individual consciousness. Within each category, there lies a power dichotomy that projects a layer of oppression that develops deeply entrenched conflict group identities. The Vanderbilt rape victim will be subjected to reliving the horrific defilement of self endured as she is cruelly forced to face assaulters to prove her dehumanization for the second time. Trauma healing does not mean survivors must forget. The women of Srebrenica made certain that their experiences were neither invisible nor silent. It also does not propagate exact retribution in order to achieve transformative justice. Peace is not found in sole dismantlement of institutional discrimination, but rather in the space created by the candor of conflict acknowledgment. The raw, revolting violations must be honestly embraced by all players, victims and perpetrators alike, if ever one hopes to explain progress without devaluing the human experience and enforce accountability. Collective truth must be 10 behavior that guide the pursuit of what is deemed right. Cultural change is that determinant. Only then will structural mechanisms be designed to fit all at the table, and only then will equality be safeguarded for justice to be fully achieved. As Vanderbilt students, we too must unpack our predispositions and take collective responsibility for the manners in which we contribute to the existing subculture. The cycle of violence does not end until the culture of violence has been converted to one of respect. As members of the Vanderbilt community, we possess the ultimate autonomy over how we will respond to systematic exploitation. Structural reform establishes the environment for equal opportunity and ensures accountability, but it is the will of collective community that decides upon how to navigate freedom. Ideological obstructions to justice such as William Easterly’s belief in divisions along ethnic lines despite the fact that it was extreme ethnic identities that justified out-group subjugation (“corruption result of inequality. Prevention and definitive transformation efforts must be refocused to address disrupted power imbalances and ecological systems rather than stereotyping perpetrators and victim-conducive individuals. Structures of inequality create a culture of inequality, but peacebuilding is sourced in the synergistic actualization of community. The acquisition of transformative justice is inextricably tied to the culture it is immersed in. The culmination of conflict resolution efforts leaves a residual footprint on the target community in the priorities it promotes. The dynamic nature of conflict proves that values and beliefs are capable of being constructively shaped by the social environment. The culture of peace is created upon the efforts of forgiveness, conscious recognition of guilt, and collaborative consideration for humanity’s integrative development. Such paradigm shift is the ultimate component that drives reconciliation. The power to choose peace is within us.